Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pissant
Seems Hitch has the same perspective on Palin and Obama as our friend David Brooks at the NY Times.

His focus was on McCain. And he's right. The man is erratic. I don't like him. I don't trust him. But I must vote for him to spare the country of an even more idiotic nutcase.

The right is chivalrous and protective when it comes to Palin. Most, like you, ignore McCain. Where is the common sense in that?

67 posted on 10/13/2008 2:41:23 PM PDT by Glenn (Free Venezuela!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Glenn
His focus was on McCain.

Let's see:

"And the only public events that have so far featured his absurd choice of running mate have shown her to be a deceiving and unscrupulous woman utterly unversed in any of the needful political discourses but easily trained to utter preposterous lies and to appeal to the basest element of her audience".

That's focusing like a laser beam on Mccain alright. His biggest criticism of Mccain is that he had the gall to select her.

The reason I don't focus on McCain because he is impossible to defend on too many subjects. His ONLY saving grace is choosing Palin. And if he pulls this election off, it will not be because the base gives one rip about Mccain.

68 posted on 10/13/2008 2:55:44 PM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: Glenn
Where is the common sense in that?

We're hoping he has a physical or mental breakdown shortly after taking office.

70 posted on 10/13/2008 3:07:54 PM PDT by KevinB (John McCain is to the Republican Party as James Taylor is to the the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson