McCains campaign has sent an incoherent message about 0bama.
It has failed to define him.
What good is talking about William Ayers or ACORN if the campaign doesnt use these associations to draw a conclusion about 0bama?
McCain needs to use not one, but rather the aggregate of 0bamas influences in life to bring him into focus. Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright, William Ayers, Saul Alinsky, ACORN, The Democratic Socialists of America, The New Party. What do they all have in common?
The answer: a dangerous, radical, far left ideology.
McCain must make this about ideology, and take 0bamas associations as instructive. He should highlight that Saul Alinsky taught radicals to cut their hair, put on a suit, and take down the government from the inside, and 0bama was so versed in Alinskys tactics that he taught them to ACORN activists.
McCains ACORN ad reveals that 0bama taught for ACORN, but it never reveals the substance of what he taught.
The substance is what we need to understand 0bama. The substance is what makes it tangible.
McCain needs to call 0bama wolf in sheeps clothing. A clean-cut radical with very little papertrail infiltrating the system in order to destroy it.
Exposing 0bamas radical agenda would be enough to ensure his defeat. It is what McCain must do.
You’re absolutely right. The problem with McCain is, as he’s demonstrated repeatedly over the years, he’s not hostile to the ideology in question. His capitulations to the left are a point of pride.
I don’t think he fully grasps what these people actually stand for. He doesn’t understand the inherent evil of Marxism. He just sees it as bad economic policy. Not the godless pseudo-religion hell-bent on destruction that it is.