The McCain campaign said the $15,000 a month went to Davis's firm, not to Davis. "Mr. Davis has received no salary or compensation ... no profit or partner distributions ... neither has Mr. Davis received any equity in the firm based on profits derived since his financial separation" from the firm in 2006, the campaign said in a statement posted on its Web site.
Ok but he must also answer the Deregulator label
I assume McCain meant stifling regulations on business that drive them out of the country and NOT on the banking industry
Is this correct ?