Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sandy23185
I am interested in opening a debate with you about your position on this. If you're game, would you kindly reply to the following questions:

What, in your opinion, is the reason governments sanction marriages?

Since marriage is fundamentally a religion-based practice, why would the government get involved in something that is, on the surface, none of their business?

42 posted on 10/10/2008 1:34:59 PM PDT by Shethink13
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: Shethink13

I am happy to offer my position on this. I think the government’s role in recognizing and providing legal benefits for married couples has to do with protection: if two people in marriage share everything (bank accounts, belongings, houses, children), governmental protections of marriage ensure a safety net in case something were to happen (such as a nasty divorce or one partner’s death, etc). Currently, gay couples are denied these same protections under law (and no, civil unions to not grant the same rights as marriages!)


49 posted on 10/10/2008 2:07:17 PM PDT by sandy23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson