Posted on 10/09/2008 9:43:10 PM PDT by txroadkill
WASHINGTON -- Convicted felon Tony Rezko. Unrepentant terrorist Bill Ayers. And the race-baiting Rev. Jeremiah Wright. It is hard to think of any presidential candidate before Barack Obama sporting associations with three more execrable characters. Yet let the McCain campaign raise the issue, and the mainstream media begin fulminating about dirty campaigning tinged with racism and McCarthyite guilt by association.
But associations are important. They provide a significant insight into character. They are particularly relevant in relation to a potential president as new, unknown, opaque and self-contained as Obama. With the economy overshadowing everything, it may be too late politically to be raising this issue. But that does not make it, as conventional wisdom holds, in any way illegitimate.
(Excerpt) Read more at realclearpolitics.com ...
Wow! This is one of Charles’ best columns, EVER. Direct, succinct, and full of bite.
Farrakhan Nation of Islam Saviour's Day 2008
Why are these associations important? Do I think Obama is as corrupt as Rezko? Or shares Wright's angry racism or Ayers' unreconstructed 1960s radicalism? No.
I'm not so sure we can definitely answer no to those questions. Obama has obviously been dissembling and less than candid about these relationships -- how do we know he doesn't share these attitudes and views to some extent, but is just more disciplined about hiding it in his current public persona? I hope for the sake of the nation if Obama is elected that Charles is right here.
As another poster said, "we're going to have to drag McCain across the victory line".
I am encouraged by seeing at the McCain Town Hall events that the people there let him know how mad we are at him for not fighting harder. I hope he got the message. Too bad we never got the chance to do the same to Bush during the last 4 years.
DAMNIT, DEFEND US!
Well, Todd Palin is a drunk driver!!!!!
Second, and even more disturbing than the cynicism, is the window these associations give on Obama's core beliefs. He doesn't share Rev. Wright's poisonous views of race nor Ayers' views, past and present, about the evil that is American society. But Obama clearly did not consider these views beyond the pale....
Until now. Today, on the threshold of the presidency, Obama concedes the odiousness of these associations, which is why he has severed them.
Charles makes some excellent points, but then his column collapses in inconsistent logic.
If we are to believe Obama is cynical, as Charles indicates, then WHY should we believe Obama is sincere when he claims the views of these men are odious and that he does not share them?
Especially in light of his backing and filling -- Obama never came clean when challenged on any of these men, in each case he attempted to get by with something limited ("I cannot disown Rev. Wright" "Ayers is a guy in my neighborhood, our kids went to the same school") and when that didn't fly, retreated a bit more.
It is just as likely that Obama shares these men's views of America, but as a smart, ambitious politician he is following Alinsky's advice to disguise himself as more moderate than he really is in order to obtain power.
My father told me that you are judged by the company you keep.I have real problems with Obama’s company
Which is why the rightwing press has ZERO influence on Americans anymore.
They write for their more powerful peers in the liberal media, not us.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.