Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: abb

SO more people will be getting their news from CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, Oprah, People, Springer, MTV, etc. Until yesterday I thought decline of newspapers was good news. Not necessarily. People are not turning from newspapers because they don’t like liberal bias. Wishful thinking. TV sources have exploded over the last few decades. There used to be 3 1/2 hour network news shows every day. Now in addition we have several 24/7 cable news sources PLUS internet. Who needs to spend money on newspaper. Younger people never touch the things.
All this glee over the newspapers decline is delusional. It also means news sources are more centralized and controlled.


6 posted on 10/09/2008 4:59:04 AM PDT by all the best
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: all the best
It also means news sources are more centralized and controlled.

I disagree. And as evidence, I cite this very discussion board on which we post. And many thousands of other blogs and discussion boards available today that formerly were not.

9 posted on 10/09/2008 5:02:22 AM PDT by abb ("What ISN'T in the news is often more important than what IS." Ed Biersmith, 1942 -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: all the best
It also means news sources are more centralized and controlled.
Data actually indicates the exact opposite. Pay particular attention to the last line of the Universal McCann study.

Blogs are Pervasive and Part of Our Daily Lives

There have been a number of studies aimed at understanding the size of the Blogosphere, yielding widely disparate estimates of both the number of blogs and blog readership. All studies agree, however, that blogs are a global phenomenon that has hit the mainstream.

The numbers vary but agree that blogs are here to stay


12 posted on 10/09/2008 8:29:21 AM PDT by Milhous (Ask me about my Anger Management Disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

To: all the best

The Columbian is very liberal leaning, particularly on important local issues. They are very much controlled by or part of the local democratic party elite.

The consistently support raising taxes to fund utopian big-government programs.

Their latest cause is forcing us to get light rail, which is basically something our neighbors across the river in Oregon are forcing on us.

Your comments are thoughtful, but in this case ... we really might be better off without the Columbian. Many people (including me) HAVE stopped buying this paper because of it’s liberal bias.

The comments on their own web site are running 70% towards “serves you right, good riddance, if you weren’t totally in bed with the dems we might still read you ...”

The just did their election endorsements. I believe it was 100% Dems.


16 posted on 10/09/2008 9:49:49 PM PDT by Jack Black
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson