The lawsuit seems to have targetted the redlining practice.
Basically...white and black with equal credit histories receiving different loan results.
I don’t see this as a smoking gun.
But how do we know this was his intent? We don't. For all we know, it's about forcing banks to make loans to people who are NOT creditworthy. Just because Obama says he's doing it for one reason, doesn't mean he's not doing it for another.
Loaning standards were lowered, then utterly obliterated, because of these race-hustlers—they SAID they were an anti-redlining effort, but it was all really an anti-white, communist strategy to collapse our capitalist economy by overwhelming and overloading it with aggressive, unrelenting demands for emtitlements and “equality.”
“Diversity” quotas in mortage lending were enforced, and just as our educational, industrial, cultural, and intellectual institutions are collapsing under the strain of lowered/non-existent standards due to the pandemic affirmative-action zeitgeist, so has the housing industry and our entire economy.
Do NOT believe what ACORN and CNN and “moderates” from either party say about it all.
It was a campaign of financial affirmative-action blackmail and shakedowns, and if we as a nation don’t grow a spine and a pair, we will continue to cower, grovel, and kow-tow to the minorities that seek the EEOC—Eventual Elimination Of Caucasians.
Google “The Cloward-Piven Strategy.”
You will understand.
“The lawsuit seems to have targetted the redlining practice.”
Have you read the complaint? That seems like the logical place to start before telling us what the lawsuit was about.