Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Arizona, Arizona State & Nebraska Law Schools Accused of Discrimination Against White Applicants
Center for Equal Opportunity ^

Posted on 10/08/2008 7:13:15 PM PDT by flyfree

(Phoenix, AZ) Two new studies released today by the Center for Equal Opportunity document evidence of severe discrimination based on race and ethnicity in law school admissions at the University of Arizona and Arizona State University. At both law schools, African Americans and, to a lesser extent, Latinos are admitted with significantly lower undergraduate grade-point averages and LSAT scores than whites and, again to a lesser extent, Asians....

CEO Releases New Study Documenting Racial and Ethnic Preferences at U of Nebraska Law School

(Lincoln, Nebraska) A new study released today by the Center for Equal Opportunity documents evidence of severe discrimination based on race and ethnicity in law school admissions at the University of Nebraska. African Americans and, to a lesser extent, Latinos are admitted with significantly lower undergraduate grade-point averages and LSAT scores than whites and, again to a lesser extent, Asians.

(Excerpt) Read more at ceousa.org ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Arizona; US: Nebraska
KEYWORDS: asu; uofa; uofn

1 posted on 10/08/2008 7:13:16 PM PDT by flyfree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: flyfree

So I guess the consequence is if I want the best doctor or lawyer I need to choose a white or Asian.

Hey, wait a minute. Barry Hussein Obama is a lawyer!


2 posted on 10/08/2008 7:15:17 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Amazing how Obama, Rangel, Biden and Dodd all got killer mortgage rates and below cost property.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

If you’re in Nebraska, please vote for 424!!! End racial preferences!!!


3 posted on 10/08/2008 7:16:45 PM PDT by curling
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

Yih! Down with....blackey??


4 posted on 10/08/2008 7:16:59 PM PDT by max americana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

Get used to it.


5 posted on 10/08/2008 7:18:40 PM PDT by LeonardFMason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

If the Supreme Court had any sense of shame, they’d admit preferences violate the same clause of the Fourteenth Amendment that protects minorities against discrimination. The same law cannot mean different things for different racial groups in a free society.


6 posted on 10/08/2008 7:19:24 PM PDT by Tublecane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

We gave loans to people who couldn’t pay them back because they were “minority”.

We’re giving education to people who are less than qualified because they’re “minority”.

We’re letting thousands of unskilled workers across our borders illegally because they’re “minority”.

And if Obama loses, our “minority” friends are threatening violence because they say they don’t have a shot in our nation.


7 posted on 10/08/2008 7:22:26 PM PDT by Tzimisce (How Would Mohammed Vote? Obama for President!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

This actually screws over minority applicants who are admitted via Affirmative Action. They pay tuition to schools from which most of them will not graduate.


8 posted on 10/08/2008 7:24:04 PM PDT by Repeal 16-17 (Let me know when the Shooting starts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

Yes. They are set up to fail. Then the libs sit around and wonder how their invincible plans failed - they threw all the money in the world at it, and gave artificial boosts to the side they wanted to benefit.

It doesn’t do anyone, regardless of color, race, gender, any good to put them in situations where they are set up to fail. Same logic with our stupid housing mess. It doesn’t do anyone any good to make loans to people who have no chance in paying them back.


9 posted on 10/08/2008 7:28:06 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: flyfree
"Affirmative action" is discrimination. Openly, knowingly, and with the specifically stated objective of changing the racial and ethnic makeup of institutions employing it. Individual merit has very little to do with it.

I'd be happy if this were overturned in the courts but it isn't likely to be. It still has legions of supporters in LiberalLand and to object to it is to be labeled a racist. And it's been that way for a very, very long time now.

10 posted on 10/08/2008 7:28:13 PM PDT by Billthedrill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Repeal 16-17

And not only that, it is insulting to those that don’t need affirmative action to get them there. Everyone looks at them like that’s the reason they are there. And it further engrains in their heads that they can’t make it unless they get help because everyone knows they can’t do it on their own. That’s crap. Maybe it takes someone longer to get there on their own, or maybe they realize that isn’t the particular job for their skills. It just sickens me because the libs want a pat on the back from blacks for affirmative action, which is really a veiled insult at the very people they are supposed to be helping.


11 posted on 10/08/2008 7:31:07 PM PDT by Secret Agent Man (I'd like to tell you, but then I'd have to kill you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Secret Agent Man
It doesn’t do anyone, regardless of color, race, gender, any good to put them in situations where they are set up to fail.

I must disagree here. When one fails, one may become bitter towards the institution and society and look to government to provide succor and redress. Presto! A Democrat. Guess who benefits?

12 posted on 10/08/2008 7:34:14 PM PDT by 17th Miss Regt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

If you think it’s bad now, if “The One” becomes the President, you ain’t seen nothing yet. All those agency’s that investigate this type of discrimination are going to disappear by order of Obami. The whole world will enter before any whites.

Now get to the back of the bus and stfu.


13 posted on 10/08/2008 8:26:06 PM PDT by Pit1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tublecane
It's the same logic Roger Taney used in the Dred Scott decision (that the rights in the Constitution weren't meant to apply to black people). The 14th amendment was adopted after the Civil War to protect the rights of the former slaves; when it speaks about "the equal protection of the laws" it didn't mean to include white people.
14 posted on 10/08/2008 8:37:04 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

It works that way in the legal job market as well. You are at a distinct advantage for being hired if you are a minority or a woman.

This is because a lot of the bigger and more lucrative clients, such as financial institutions, have internal political correctness policies that allow them to hire a law firm to do their work only if the firm can demonstrate it has a certain percentage of minority and women lawyers. And since, in particular, women have a much higher career “washout” rate, for example, many take maternity leave when they have their first child and then decide not to return once they experience life without the constant stress of law practice, this leads to an even heavier bias in hiring women because hiring partners know the retention rate will be lower. (I would say the retention issue is not there with minority lawyers, it’s really a woman issue.)

I just said several things that respectable law firms and corporate clients would never admit publicly, but as a law firm partner I see it all the time. I would say over the past 10 years, my firm has probably hired 4 to five times more women applicants than male applicants, although most of the women stay only about 5 years on average.


15 posted on 10/08/2008 8:42:11 PM PDT by kaehurowing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: flyfree

Ironically, I had lunch with a friend today, a lawyer originally from South America.

He told me his son had been goofing off in school (he’s a senior). Later in the conversation he mentioned Nebraska was hot after him. I asked “Nebraska? Why Nebraska”? He replied “I don’t know, he’s never expressed an interest in going there.”


16 posted on 10/08/2008 9:14:16 PM PDT by A_Former_Democrat (Obama . . .dumbest candidate in history.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson