Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Our guys lose it when they get to the Times. Brooks predicts a 9-point Obama victory -- that's Reagan-level, isn't it? Also -- can you stand it -- he says, "Obama has the great intellect..." After a discussion about Niebuhr, "I was dazzled, I felt the tingle up my knee as Chris Matthews would say."

Brooks has the gall to quote Buckley's line about the 2,000 people in the phone book being preferable as a governing body to the faculty of Harvard et al -- then disagree with it -- then claim Buckley disagreed with it -- then go on to prove the truth of the aphorism on himself. What an ass!

Maybe this is all a misquote -- but, I think probably not.... Brooks & Peggy Noonan must be having high tea together, with some chemical chasers.

1 posted on 10/08/2008 3:16:45 PM PDT by publius1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last
To: publius1

Brooks is definitely hallucinating.


2 posted on 10/08/2008 3:19:27 PM PDT by Parley Baer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

David Brooks being his eastern elite catty metrosexual self.


3 posted on 10/08/2008 3:19:27 PM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

Ah — here’s the quote by the man himself on YouTube — no way to dissociate himself from it — including the fatal cancer quote —

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvxQwNqZSOQ&eurl=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2008/10/08/david-brooks-sarah-palin_n_133001.html


4 posted on 10/08/2008 3:19:46 PM PDT by publius1 (Just to be clear: my position is no.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

Where did you come up with this BS? An email from whom? I am not buying it.


5 posted on 10/08/2008 3:20:13 PM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

The video is here:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GvxQwNqZSOQ


6 posted on 10/08/2008 3:20:16 PM PDT by UndauntedR
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1
If Brooks is a Republican, then I am an astronaut and I am engaged to Princess Zargon of Neptune.

Brooks, is at best, a Rockeffeller, limp-wristed, country club, psuedo-intellectual, dweeb who could only pass as a Republican in Lower Manhattan. Not anywhere else.

7 posted on 10/08/2008 3:20:17 PM PDT by keithtoo (GOP - Our Veep candidate can kick your Veep candidate's @ss!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

Palin has all Dems and most Pubs scared.

Let’s get her in there.

McCain/Palin Nov 4th 2008


8 posted on 10/08/2008 3:20:34 PM PDT by silentreignofheroes (Shoul have seen it in color.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

The NYC beltway types indicated a year ago that they wanted to see a black guy win.....to heal our nation, or some such affirmative action pap.

Well, they will get their wish, and will see an even greater rift in our nation.

Because they..the media and the DNC have cheated and corrupted this election.

Paybacks will be a bitch.


9 posted on 10/08/2008 3:20:38 PM PDT by roses of sharon (The MSM vampires must die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

Here’s what is so galling:

One may agree or disagree with whether Palin’s approach is “anti-intellectual.” (I disagree and believe she is challenging eggheaded Ivory-Tower naive liberals, as did Ike vs. Adlai Stevenson.)

But let’s keep some perspective and just write, “I don’t like her approach and think it’s wrong.”

Instead, Brooks goes off the proverbial deep end. Not only is Palin’s approach a “cancer,” but it’s also a “fatal” one.

Mr. Brooks, get it together.


10 posted on 10/08/2008 3:21:00 PM PDT by pogo101
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

I don’t understand the benefit of republishing obvious garbage on Free Republic.


11 posted on 10/08/2008 3:21:12 PM PDT by devere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

CANCER, Heres your Cancer, Obama Cancer!
Ayers Obama Chavez!
Ayers has since lectured the Marxist dictator of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez, on using public education as an instrument for advancing “revolution.” Meanwhile his stepson, Chesa Boudin, has gone to Caracas as an “adviser” to the anti-American Chavez.

Oh, by coincidence, Chavez and Castro are two of the dictators Obama said he’d like to give face time as president of the U.S.

It gets worse when one looks at Obama’s political organization.

Obama’s own Web site has held at least 15 favorable mentions of Che Guevara, according to a count by blogger Henry Gomez.

When an Obama precinct captain in Houston flew a Cuban flag bearing Guevara’s likeness, Obama said only it “disappointed” him and “does not reflect (his) views.” He never publicly ordered the flag down, nor rejected Guevara’s blood-soaked communism.

Another Obama supporter, acting in Obama’s name, secretly contacted Colombia’s Marxist FARC terror chief Raul Reyes to tell him that Obama would cut off U.S. military aid to Colombia to hinder its war against FARC, as well as deny Colombia free trade, a strategy FARC considers key to overturning Colombia’s democracy.

http://www.ibdeditorials.com/IBDArticles.aspx?id=294880428846293


12 posted on 10/08/2008 3:21:36 PM PDT by OPS4 (Ops4 God Bless America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

Brooks if this is true, let the party die and we will rebuld a new, revitalized one, with Sarah at the helm.


13 posted on 10/08/2008 3:22:35 PM PDT by BornToBeAmerican (Sarahcuda = the dems worst nightmare)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

A writing based on flawed premises = zero.


15 posted on 10/08/2008 3:23:04 PM PDT by anniegetyourgun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1
And I stopped reading right about...... THERE!

David Brooks spoke frankly about the presidential and vice presidential candidates Monday afternoon, calling Sarah Palin a "fatal cancer to the Republican party" but describing John McCain and Barack Obama as "the two best candidates we've had in a long time."

16 posted on 10/08/2008 3:23:11 PM PDT by bayliving (Democrats used to be funny. Now they're just plain dangerous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1
which is a very subtle thought process based on the idea that you have to use power while it corrupts you.

I don't know, but that sounds like the cancer to me unless the guy is not describing it properly.

Woodrow Wilson was one of the smartest guys to be President. Carter was pretty book smart as well. Both turned out to be pretty bad Presidents.

Reagan was portrayed as an idiot also, but is writings later disproved that. Harry S Truman was not a great academic but got to the heart of the Cold War pretty fast. Lincoln was often described as a baboon and ignorant hayseed but turns out to have been darn effective.

Elitism is not just for Democrats.
18 posted on 10/08/2008 3:24:30 PM PDT by Arkinsaw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

I saw the video. I apologize. Brooks is one of these elitist country club Reps who hates conservatives. His arrogance is only exceeded by his ignorance.


19 posted on 10/08/2008 3:24:38 PM PDT by kabar (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

brooks went to the dark side long ago.

this must be a resentment to her personal views regarding appropriate behavior and that mating habits do not establish special rights.


20 posted on 10/08/2008 3:24:58 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

At this point in time, I would rather trust Palin than any of the corrupt politicians in DC.

David Brooks, you are not ready to be a journalist or pundit. I say that because you write as a person that embodies all that the masses hate.

If you and your buds had done so well, we would not have the problems we are dealing with right now.

David, dunce hat, corner.


21 posted on 10/08/2008 3:25:09 PM PDT by dforest (Is there any good idea out there that Obama doesn't lay claim to anymore?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

You see, pseudo-intellectuals are always impressed by other psuedo-intellectuals, because they intuitively recognize their own lack of true intellectual content and are impressed by any display of superficial intellectual ability.

All real intellectuals are intuitively anti-intellectual. The first of them all was Socrates, who famously said “The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing”


22 posted on 10/08/2008 3:25:35 PM PDT by Truthsearcher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: publius1

Palin is a fatal blow to RINOs. She and Bobby Jindal are the current and future stars of conservatives. I’m excited about our future.


24 posted on 10/08/2008 3:26:30 PM PDT by Night Hides Not (McCain is Lucy, McCainiacs are Charlie Brown, & the football was a secure border...before Sarah.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-92 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson