Skip to comments.
Did Romney’s remarks hint at a Romney-Palin showdown in 2012?
politickerma.com ^
Posted on 10/07/2008 6:14:40 PM PDT by mathwhizz
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
To: cripplecreek
“Can we get through this election first?”
You might be posting to a troll, mathwizz has been here two days, has posted two meaningless threads, and has not answered or responded to anyone.
21
posted on
10/07/2008 6:48:39 PM PDT
by
ansel12
(The old Sarah smile. She is some girl, Sarah Barracuda. Hell, she's a natural-born world-shaker.)
To: mathwhizz
I think Mitt Romney would be a GOOD vice-Presidential running mate for Sarah Palin in 2012!
22
posted on
10/07/2008 6:49:25 PM PDT
by
Redbob
(W.W.J.B.D. - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
To: mathwhizz; Lancey Howard; Impy; Clintonfatigued; Clemenza; AuH2ORepublican; JohnnyZ; darkangel82; ..
*Slick Willard truth squad ping*
Will this lying liberal jackass EVER STFU and disappear ?
23
posted on
10/07/2008 6:50:17 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: mathwhizz; redgirlinabluestate
While Romney may have been reflecting the mainstream conventional wisdom going into last week's vice presidential debate, some say Romney's remarks are a glimpse ahead to a possible 2012 match-up between Romney and Palin, if McCain loses this year's race for the White House. "Some say." Really? Is this another example of the hallucinatory features of Mitt Derangment Syndrome, the conservative counterpart to the liberals' Palin Derangment Syndrome? Because from where I sit the man said NOTHING negative about Palin, has been nothing but SUPPORTIVE, yet the political psychotics can't let go. It is their mission in life to hate Mitt Romney. Get therapy.
24
posted on
10/07/2008 6:51:22 PM PDT
by
Canticle_of_Deborah
(Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
To: Redbob
"I think Mitt Romney would be a GOOD vice-Presidential running mate for
Sarah Palin Hillary Clinton in 2012!"
Fixed it for you.
25
posted on
10/07/2008 6:51:37 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt, Deb. His paid operatives have been out badmouthing and undermining Gov. Palin from the day McCain chose her for VP. Slick Willard, just another lying liberal sleaze doing the dirty work for the rodent party.
26
posted on
10/07/2008 6:53:46 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: fieldmarshaldj
I think you should try therapy.
You are flat out hallucinating.
27
posted on
10/07/2008 6:58:49 PM PDT
by
Canticle_of_Deborah
(Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
To: NutCrackerBoy
he comes off as a little false at times.
Where you around in 94 when he was running against Kennedy
Early on he was ahead by double digits in the polls
So the cocky fool came out and said that he didn't want the support of the extremist Christian Conservatives or the NRA types
Guess he had a change of mind since then
Typical insincere politician
28
posted on
10/07/2008 6:59:45 PM PDT
by
uncbob
To: mathwhizz
I wouldn’t cross the street to piss on Romney if he was on fire.
29
posted on
10/07/2008 7:00:02 PM PDT
by
TheThirdRuffian
(Bomb, Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran! Bomb. Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran!)
To: Redbob
Romney would be a good VP for Obama. Both equally fake.
30
posted on
10/07/2008 7:00:50 PM PDT
by
TheThirdRuffian
(Bomb, Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran! Bomb. Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran!)
To: Canticle_of_Deborah
Still worshipping his hairness, Deb ? Time to wake up and smell the White Rain.
31
posted on
10/07/2008 7:00:59 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: TheThirdRuffian
The difference between Obie and Slick Willard is that at least Barry is honest about what party he really belongs to.
32
posted on
10/07/2008 7:03:05 PM PDT
by
fieldmarshaldj
(~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
To: mathwhizz
Would the Romney supporters please just give it up? I’m tired of this riculous love affair with the guy.
Whatever Mccain’s future Sarah is my first choice for ‘12. Absent her, then Jindal. But I have NO interest in a Romney Presidency. Didn’t before, most certainly do not now.
To: mathwhizz
34
posted on
10/07/2008 7:30:37 PM PDT
by
aMorePerfectUnion
(Stalin was a community organizer...)
To: JohnnyZ
Mitt was my first choice for Presidential candidate, as well as Vice-Presidential. I havent changed my mind. I have a slight concern about his electability he comes off as a little false at times. -NutCrackerBoy A little false -- at times?
You mean when he's lying about owning a gun?
Or lying about being a hunter?
Or lying about his gun-grabbing record?
Or lying about both he and his father marching with MLK?
Or lying about his pro-abortion record?
Or lying about his support for gay rights?
In a word, no. You list flip-flops. While real, I do not for a microsecond accept that they tell the story of a Mitt candidacy for President.
He is a fine leader, smart enough to understand what needs to be done from a conservative point of view (including especially judicial nominations), and I believe that he sincerely wants to serve for all the right reasons.
My misgivings were that he too often appears insincere.
To: mathwhizz
This whole idea sounds silly. If McCain-Palin doesn't win, she's going to be damaged going into 2012. She's going to be the VP candidate who couldn't deliver the demographic groups that she needed to deliver. If she goes back to Alaska next year and serves six more years as a very competent governor, she'll be a viable candidate in 2016, but if she loses this year, she won't be a strong candidate for 2012.
Whether Mitt Romney is in a good position to run in 2012 remains to be seen. If McCain-Palin doesn't win, many of us will be further persuaded that Mitt Romney was the better candidate. Certainly he would be stronger right now with the economy in turmoil. However, the country will be a different place in four years. Mitt Romney could be a favorite in four years, but the notion that he is setting up a conflict with Sarah Palin is silly.
Bill
36
posted on
10/07/2008 7:47:54 PM PDT
by
WFTR
(Liberty isn't for cowards)
To: mathwhizz
Wasn’t so big on Romney from the outset, but grew to like him as the field dwindled.
Since that time I have spoken with a few Evangelicals; he will never win the top of the ticket for the GOP.
37
posted on
10/07/2008 7:48:22 PM PDT
by
incredulous joe
(George Soros; Owner Democratic Party)
To: mathwhizz
Oh come on why would Palin run for VP again?
That does not make sense.
38
posted on
10/07/2008 7:54:08 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
To: libbylu
McCain is a drag on the ticket.
39
posted on
10/07/2008 7:56:42 PM PDT
by
svcw
(Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
To: Tax-chick
Mitt is the second coming of Barry Goldwater, compared to a Kennedy.
so he’d lose by a landslide?
40
posted on
10/07/2008 8:01:07 PM PDT
by
ari-freedom
(Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-73 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson