Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Did Romney’s remarks hint at a Romney-Palin showdown in 2012?
politickerma.com ^

Posted on 10/07/2008 6:14:40 PM PDT by mathwhizz

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last
To: cripplecreek

“Can we get through this election first?”

You might be posting to a troll, mathwizz has been here two days, has posted two meaningless threads, and has not answered or responded to anyone.


21 posted on 10/07/2008 6:48:39 PM PDT by ansel12 (The old Sarah smile. She is some girl, Sarah Barracuda. Hell, she's a natural-born world-shaker.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

I think Mitt Romney would be a GOOD vice-Presidential running mate for Sarah Palin in 2012!


22 posted on 10/07/2008 6:49:25 PM PDT by Redbob (W.W.J.B.D. - "What Would Jack Bauer Do?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz; Lancey Howard; Impy; Clintonfatigued; Clemenza; AuH2ORepublican; JohnnyZ; darkangel82; ..

*Slick Willard truth squad ping*

Will this lying liberal jackass EVER STFU and disappear ?


23 posted on 10/07/2008 6:50:17 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz; redgirlinabluestate
While Romney may have been reflecting the mainstream conventional wisdom going into last week's vice presidential debate, some say Romney's remarks are a glimpse ahead to a possible 2012 match-up between Romney and Palin, if McCain loses this year's race for the White House.

"Some say." Really? Is this another example of the hallucinatory features of Mitt Derangment Syndrome, the conservative counterpart to the liberals' Palin Derangment Syndrome? Because from where I sit the man said NOTHING negative about Palin, has been nothing but SUPPORTIVE, yet the political psychotics can't let go. It is their mission in life to hate Mitt Romney. Get therapy.

24 posted on 10/07/2008 6:51:22 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob
"I think Mitt Romney would be a GOOD vice-Presidential running mate for Sarah Palin Hillary Clinton in 2012!"

Fixed it for you.

25 posted on 10/07/2008 6:51:37 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Denial ain’t just a river in Egypt, Deb. His paid operatives have been out badmouthing and undermining Gov. Palin from the day McCain chose her for VP. Slick Willard, just another lying liberal sleaze doing the dirty work for the rodent party.


26 posted on 10/07/2008 6:53:46 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

I think you should try therapy.

You are flat out hallucinating.


27 posted on 10/07/2008 6:58:49 PM PDT by Canticle_of_Deborah (Repentance is a contract with God for a second life - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: NutCrackerBoy
he comes off as a little false at times.

Where you around in 94 when he was running against Kennedy

Early on he was ahead by double digits in the polls

So the cocky fool came out and said that he didn't want the support of the extremist Christian Conservatives or the NRA types

Guess he had a change of mind since then

Typical insincere politician
28 posted on 10/07/2008 6:59:45 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

I wouldn’t cross the street to piss on Romney if he was on fire.


29 posted on 10/07/2008 7:00:02 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Bomb, Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran! Bomb. Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Redbob

Romney would be a good VP for Obama. Both equally fake.


30 posted on 10/07/2008 7:00:50 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Bomb, Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran! Bomb. Bomb. Bomb! Bomb bomb Iran!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Canticle_of_Deborah

Still worshipping his hairness, Deb ? Time to wake up and smell the White Rain.


31 posted on 10/07/2008 7:00:59 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: TheThirdRuffian

The difference between Obie and Slick Willard is that at least Barry is honest about what party he really belongs to.


32 posted on 10/07/2008 7:03:05 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

Would the Romney supporters please just give it up? I’m tired of this riculous love affair with the guy.

Whatever Mccain’s future Sarah is my first choice for ‘12. Absent her, then Jindal. But I have NO interest in a Romney Presidency. Didn’t before, most certainly do not now.


33 posted on 10/07/2008 7:16:37 PM PDT by Soul Seeker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

Mitt: All about Mitt.


34 posted on 10/07/2008 7:30:37 PM PDT by aMorePerfectUnion (Stalin was a community organizer...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JohnnyZ
Mitt was my first choice for Presidential candidate, as well as Vice-Presidential. I haven’t changed my mind. I have a slight concern about his electability — he comes off as a little false at times. -NutCrackerBoy

A little false -- at times?

You mean when he's lying about owning a gun?
Or lying about being a hunter?
Or lying about his gun-grabbing record?
Or lying about both he and his father marching with MLK?
Or lying about his pro-abortion record?
Or lying about his support for gay rights?

In a word, no. You list flip-flops. While real, I do not for a microsecond accept that they tell the story of a Mitt candidacy for President.

He is a fine leader, smart enough to understand what needs to be done from a conservative point of view (including especially judicial nominations), and I believe that he sincerely wants to serve for all the right reasons.

My misgivings were that he too often appears insincere.

35 posted on 10/07/2008 7:37:12 PM PDT by NutCrackerBoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz
This whole idea sounds silly. If McCain-Palin doesn't win, she's going to be damaged going into 2012. She's going to be the VP candidate who couldn't deliver the demographic groups that she needed to deliver. If she goes back to Alaska next year and serves six more years as a very competent governor, she'll be a viable candidate in 2016, but if she loses this year, she won't be a strong candidate for 2012.

Whether Mitt Romney is in a good position to run in 2012 remains to be seen. If McCain-Palin doesn't win, many of us will be further persuaded that Mitt Romney was the better candidate. Certainly he would be stronger right now with the economy in turmoil. However, the country will be a different place in four years. Mitt Romney could be a favorite in four years, but the notion that he is setting up a conflict with Sarah Palin is silly.

Bill

36 posted on 10/07/2008 7:47:54 PM PDT by WFTR (Liberty isn't for cowards)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

Wasn’t so big on Romney from the outset, but grew to like him as the field dwindled.

Since that time I have spoken with a few Evangelicals; he will never win the top of the ticket for the GOP.


37 posted on 10/07/2008 7:48:22 PM PDT by incredulous joe (George Soros; Owner Democratic Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathwhizz

Oh come on why would Palin run for VP again?
That does not make sense.


38 posted on 10/07/2008 7:54:08 PM PDT by svcw (Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: libbylu

McCain is a drag on the ticket.


39 posted on 10/07/2008 7:56:42 PM PDT by svcw (Great selection of gift baskets: http://baskettastic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Tax-chick

Mitt is the second coming of Barry Goldwater, compared to a Kennedy.

so he’d lose by a landslide?


40 posted on 10/07/2008 8:01:07 PM PDT by ari-freedom (Betcha they're good. Why shouldn't they be? Their one mistake was giving up me!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-73 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson