Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CBS Poll: Presidential Race Tightens (Obama 48%, McCain 45% LV)
CBS ^

Posted on 10/06/2008 3:51:28 PM PDT by Chet 99

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-166 next last
To: kesg; LS

Yup.

Another ugly scenario is a McCain 270 to 268 electoral college win. They’d have over a month to bribe and/or intimidate just one McCain elector to flip and throw it to the Dem controlled House.


101 posted on 10/06/2008 4:53:09 PM PDT by Chet 99 (Vote McCain/Palin, or this will be our future: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTb5EFZmgbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99; All
As I posted this morning...

Brian Wilson has been reporting from coffee shops in battleground states lately...this morning he was in Ohio chatting with the folks. He told the Friends that he is noticing this trend—if he gets an “undecided” voter and then follows up by asking them to decide right now, they always go for McCain. I thought that was good news.
102 posted on 10/06/2008 4:56:04 PM PDT by Miss Didi ("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kesg

McCain/Palin - still with a slight lead in a close race.


103 posted on 10/06/2008 4:56:40 PM PDT by impeachedrapist (Bill Clinton, as Arkansas Attorney General did you make Juanita Broaddrick pay for her rape kit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: kesg

I’ve heard that Rasmussen lags behind the trends seen in other polls. Is that true and if so, why?


104 posted on 10/06/2008 4:58:16 PM PDT by randita (Keep our own FR safe - stop the DBV's (Drive By Vanities).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies]

To: Hazwaste

Caught me. I posted my comment, read it on the board, and it was too late.

Good for you to catch it. You’re the only one so far.


105 posted on 10/06/2008 5:00:29 PM PDT by Nathan _in_Arkansas (Shut the deuce up!!! I'll do the fighting!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

Polls are just another form of deceit designed to herd political livestock. Moo-oo-oo-o-o!


106 posted on 10/06/2008 5:04:04 PM PDT by Lexington Green (Polls are just another form of deceit designed to herd political livestock. Moo-oo-oo-o-o!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
Interest in tomorrow's presidential debate is high.

McCain has to do well tomorrow night, otherwise it is over. The third debate won't matter.

107 posted on 10/06/2008 5:05:45 PM PDT by Major Matt Mason (A happy member of the New Media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: floridagopvoter; tatown; Chet 99; Perdogg; Wilder Effect; impeachedrapist
That is simply not true. You seem to be confusing stated party ID with actual turnout. In 2006 the Democrats had a 5.4% voting advantage for House candidates and a 9.4% voting advantage for Senate candidates.

Democratic House candidates may have received 5.4% more votes than Republican House candidates, and so on. But I am talking about actual Party ID. In 2006, the breakdown was D37, R34, and I29, and together this mix cast 5.4% more votes for Democratic House candidates than Republican House candidates. It turns out that the Independents voted for Democrats by a 57-39 margin, compared to 49-46 in 2004 -- and that's essentially why the House flipped the way it did.

Incidentally, while retrieving this information, I noticed something else that was very interesting. In 2004, the Independents favored Kerry, but only by a single point: 49-48. In 2000, they favored Dubya 47-45. In the Gallup polling for Sept. 22-28, McCain led this group by nine points. With McCain doing better with Independents than Dubya did and holding his own GOP base, Obama is going to need ridiculously high turnout with his own base (signficantly better than Kerry, who is already the second highest vote-getter in Presidential election history) in order to win the election.

But hey, all the media polls say Obama is going to win in a landslide. Past election history doesn't matter. Actual polling data doesn't matter. What matters is that the media says that Obama will win and resistance from stupid Republicans is futile. Right?

108 posted on 10/06/2008 5:05:48 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: tatown
Listen here.

Everyday for over a week you were told the Gallup RV poll was flawed and misleading. You kept posting it anyway, as means of providing a forum in which well meaning FReepers could br battered by trolls.

You knew that and yet, you persisted.

Now, stop it!

Take the pledge, tatown, only LV polls from now on.

109 posted on 10/06/2008 5:06:54 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

I wish Rush would issue orders to the Army that whenever polled to say you are a democrat or independent and that you are voting for Obama. We should all do this. Let’s get the dems so sure of a landslide that half of them don’t bother to show up to vote. This would be a good start in ending these incessant daily polls by rendering them even more obviously meaningless than they already are.


110 posted on 10/06/2008 5:08:27 PM PDT by TonyM (E)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nhwingut

Has anyone seen the Obama network on Dish Television? I can imagine that after Obama is elected he will feature Rev. Wright’s sermons on his network.


111 posted on 10/06/2008 5:08:31 PM PDT by Michigan CD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Major Matt Mason
McCain has to do well tomorrow night, otherwise it is over. The third debate won't matter.

So if McCain does badly tomorrow, but in the third debate Obama undresses and runs around the debate stage screaming "ALLAH AKBAR!!!" for the entirety of the 90 minute debate, it will make no difference and the election will still be over and for Obama by a landslide? Interesting.

112 posted on 10/06/2008 5:10:43 PM PDT by Chet 99 (Vote McCain/Palin, or this will be our future: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTb5EFZmgbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

But, but, but where are CatOwner, steve-b, tatown and ulandsauffhwerwer at? I thought for sure they would post a poll like this in an instant!


113 posted on 10/06/2008 5:12:55 PM PDT by CSI007
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tatown

The sample in NBC/WSJ is 82% white, this is way too high (76% would be quite good for McCain).

If I had to guess, McCain is down by 6 or 7 right now, and will not get any closer till the Dow stabilizes, and preferably above the 10000 mark, not below it.


114 posted on 10/06/2008 5:13:20 PM PDT by ubaldus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
This election is making me crazy. How about some election humor?
115 posted on 10/06/2008 5:14:16 PM PDT by Disambiguator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: floridagopvoter

The turnout will be much closer to 2004’s model than 2006’s. If you truly believe otherwise, fine. You’re not alone. But you’re also fooling yourself.


116 posted on 10/06/2008 5:14:31 PM PDT by impeachedrapist (Bill Clinton, as Arkansas Attorney General did you make Juanita Broaddrick pay for her rape kit?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
This year they’re buying to the “coming youth vote tidal wave” delusion.

The next time it happens will be the first.

There is never going to be a first time.

117 posted on 10/06/2008 5:17:52 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 95 | View Replies]

To: TonyM
You make a good point.

I saw today on FNC that "young people" are overwhelmingly supporting Obama (more than 60%).

The question that was reasonably posed is whether they'll bother going to the polls. If the latest "US" magazine has just been released, it's JagBomb night at the local bar, and the season finale of "Big Brother" is being televised all on Nov 4th, Obama may have a problem.

Sadly, my greatest hope for defeating Hussein is also my greatest fear.

Seems our youngest are not our brightest.

118 posted on 10/06/2008 5:19:49 PM PDT by daler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: impeachedrapist; kesg

What were the turnout ratios in 1996?


119 posted on 10/06/2008 5:20:49 PM PDT by Chet 99 (Vote McCain/Palin, or this will be our future: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QTb5EFZmgbs)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 116 | View Replies]

To: randita
I’ve heard that Rasmussen lags behind the trends seen in other polls. Is that true and if so, why?

I don't know. Rasmussen doesn't publish his internals or any "snapshot" polls (polls for a single night rather than a three day rolling average), at least not unless you are willing to pay for them.

120 posted on 10/06/2008 5:21:12 PM PDT by kesg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 161-166 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson