Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Obama has just spent his entire political career associating with America-loathing radicals.

But of course, Barry is a swell guy; he could never really believe the things that all his friends believe.

He doesn't really believe the transformational Marxist doctrine of Saul Alinksy that he is so closely associated with. He would never disemble, never attempt to hide his radicalism until he actually achieved the Presidency.

Would he?

1 posted on 10/06/2008 11:19:07 AM PDT by mojito
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: mojito

Sean’s show on all this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p_HZMD97nMw


2 posted on 10/06/2008 11:21:10 AM PDT by flyfree (Biden is no Palin and Obama is no McCain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
It's high time the Obama fan-dance ended.

The Left Eing media is actively campaigning for their left wing radical for President. I've never seen such a openly biased media.

3 posted on 10/06/2008 11:21:17 AM PDT by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito; holdonnow

bttt


4 posted on 10/06/2008 11:21:55 AM PDT by bassmaner (Hey commies: I am a white male, and I am guilty of NOTHING! Sell your 'white guilt' elsewhere.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
God help us if he gets in!

Lamh Foistenach Abu!
5 posted on 10/06/2008 11:22:21 AM PDT by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines, RVN 1969. St. Peregrine, patron saint of cancer patients, pray for us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: holdonnow

Thank you Mark


7 posted on 10/06/2008 11:23:58 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Back in the USSA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito; holdonnow

Mark is correct!


8 posted on 10/06/2008 11:24:03 AM PDT by tiredoflaundry (McCain/Palin '08 ----- It's October, SURPRISE ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
Why is it so hard to get through to these conservative media types? Do they all live in their own ivory towers?

Please, someone who knows how to reach Levin or whichever conservative media type -- get this to him. It makes the difference (guess I'll have to bullet-point it, so people get the points):

This is the Obama MO and if he is elected, will continue to be. He and Ayers are effectively using Hugo Chavez as their exemplar:

The Cloward-Piven Strategy
The "Luciferian Rules" Tactics

Click the links -- Send them to everyone: media, elected officials of all parties, campaign organizers, friends, family, neighbors -- the naive and unsuspecting Obama supporters you know.

Read the evidence indicating that Barack Obama seeks to grow government either directly into socialism, or into economic collapse, in order to bring an ACORN-agitated Socialist revolution. That was the goal of Saul Alinsky. That is the Cloward-Piven Strategy apparently of Frank Marshall Davis, Khalid Abdullah Tariq al-Mansour, ACORN, William Ayers, Bernardine Dohrn, et. al., who have played such essential roles in the development of both the private and public Barack Obama.

James Simpson, a former White House economist, has just published "Barack Obama & the Strategy of Manufactured Crisis" - on AmericanThinker.com at http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html

Listen to this Interview of James Simpson, by Sandy Rios, Tuesday 9/30 - WYLL 1160AM, Chicago, IL
From http://www.culturecampaign.com/culturecorner.aspx

Further documentation connecting the dots of all the neo-Marxists who have invested in the development of Barack Obama may be found on discoverthenetworks.org

Simpson documents his research in his article, providing Web links. He provides a rough flow chart.


"CHANGE"

Let's change things for these anti-American Marxists.

Give everyone in America a new vocabulary term: The Cloward-Piven Strategy.

And I have a question to the Obama investigators out there: Is it possible for someone to have roughly projected the time of the mortgage crisis -- with one or more banks? Based upon such data as default projections, could it have been possible to even trigger it? Herbert and Marion Sandler, in 2006, for example?

9 posted on 10/06/2008 11:24:10 AM PDT by unspun (Web search: "Cloward-Piven AND Obama" - get the truth out to all GOP officials & conservative media.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

This is exactly right. If Obama had an R by his name his Presidential run would’ve been over just because of those associations.


13 posted on 10/06/2008 11:27:06 AM PDT by Maelstorm (This country was not founded with the battle cry "Give me liberty or give me a government check!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Ping for later


15 posted on 10/06/2008 11:30:14 AM PDT by basil (Support the Second Amendment-buy another gun today!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Rush’s substitute host today phrased it well.

He said it wasn’t just that he associated with these people, and certainly just sitting in Wright’s church doesn’t make you “as bad” as Wright, and hanging out in Ayer’s living room doesn’t make you a terrorist.
The problem is that he clearly wasn’t sufficiently “repulsed” by them.

Most people - normal people - would have looked at this bunch and ran away from them as fast as possible.

Obama did not. He wanted their help - their support - their money.

I think he was looking for some “street cred” - and my goodness - he got it!


21 posted on 10/06/2008 11:33:21 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

bump


24 posted on 10/06/2008 11:37:10 AM PDT by gibsosa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
I am not among those who raise Obama's associations but add "of course, it doesn't mean Obama shares their views." Oh really? Indeed! Barack Obama not only tolerates abortion, he worked hard to keep infanticide legal in Illinois as a means to kill 'unwanted children'. That DOES mean he shares the values of abortionists.
25 posted on 10/06/2008 11:38:23 AM PDT by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
Liberal Democrats never have to answer to anyone, for anything. The news media now thoroughly insulate them from responsibility. Regardless of what a Democrat is accused of, no amount of evidence is ever sufficient, whereas a mere accusation against a Republicans is held as prima facie proof of guilt. We're in a very bad place as a nation right now, when truth is subservient to political expedience and the news media lie (literally and figuratively) largely on one side of a great divide.
26 posted on 10/06/2008 11:38:24 AM PDT by andy58-in-nh (Somewhere in Illinois, a community is missing its organizer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
When Hillary was running the MSM found sexist everywhere. Now that Sarah's the woman on the ticket the MSM isn't even offended by Larry Flynt doing a porn movie with a woman who's suppose to look like Palin.

Eff 'em.

27 posted on 10/06/2008 11:38:30 AM PDT by GOPJ (If Sarah had been friends with Timothy McVeigh, would the MSM give her an "Ayers pass"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

As Euripides observed, “Every man is like the company he is wont to keep.”

If a white politician had even one neo-Nazi associate, you can bet it would be a campaign issue. And the “of course, that doesn’t mean he shares his [the associate’s] views” would be rightly laughed out of the court of public opinion. Obama has had a bevy of the leftist and black analogues clustered around him.


28 posted on 10/06/2008 11:39:47 AM PDT by The_Reader_David (For real change stop electing lawyers: Fighter-Pilot/Hockey-Mom '08.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
Besides the radical friends of Obama - it seems to me it's more important for the Repbublicans to be laying out in point by point detail how the RATS are responsible for the financial crisis which both McCain & Bush tried to stop.This is just as important as Obama's sleazy friends - & in fact, affects the entire world.

The RATS voted the Repubicans attempts down & now are laying the entire blame for the problem on the Republicans.

It's insane not to stress the problem & point out to the voters that voting in the same people who caused the problem is like hiring the fox to guard the chicken coop.

Just now on Fox - Obama's spokesman said John McCain & his involvement with the Keating 5 is the cause of this financial crisis.

Republicans MUST stop playing defense & go on the offense.

29 posted on 10/06/2008 11:42:52 AM PDT by LADY J
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

Obama will be the first president to hate the US more than our enemies do. Imagine what his policies are going to be like. I’ve called him Carteresque, but he is more like Carter pumped up and mentally fried on radical steroids. An Obama presidency is likely to be one wild ride we’ll never get over.


35 posted on 10/06/2008 11:53:35 AM PDT by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito
From the National Review

Open this link to see a brilliant diagram of all of ACORN's work, and the Senators and presidential candidates who make it happen. Dodd, Frank, Schumer, and of course Barack Obama are stuck in the swamp of self-dealing, corruption, and politicial machinations, all masquerading as social justice and cheap real estate for the poor, at quite large taxpayer expense. This is a savvy Democrat web site. Follow the link for a really astonishing set of Democratic web sites which compete with each other in their exposition of Obama's perfidies, corruptions, and non-messianic attributes. Remember — former libs are much better at political knife fighting than those whose first instincts are, and remain, conservative.
39 posted on 10/06/2008 12:03:02 PM PDT by ckilmer (Phi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

So the question has been for some years now, “How do we deal with the liberal media and liberal groups and other liberal organizations?” I posit that the best way to deal with Lefty groups that endanger our liberty is the way we dealt with Right Wing groups that endangered liberty. The way Soutern Poverty killed the Klan comes to mind. First tie them to a real damage, the current economic meltdown offers an opportunity. Then take them to court and sue them into oblivion. Same with the media I suppose, sue ‘em for the damage they have done.


45 posted on 10/06/2008 12:31:36 PM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: mojito

So the question has been for some years now, “How do we deal with the liberal media and liberal groups and other liberal organizations?” I posit that the best way to deal with Lefty groups that endanger our liberty is the way we dealt with Right Wing groups that endangered liberty. The way Soutern Poverty killed the Klan comes to mind. First tie them to a real damage, the current economic meltdown offers an opportunity. Then take them to court and sue them into oblivion. Same with the media I suppose, sue ‘em for the damage they have done.


46 posted on 10/06/2008 12:31:53 PM PDT by wastoute
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson