Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: B4Ranch

Apparently the FDIC did Wachovia a special favor :

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122325530665506527.html?mod=yahoo_hs&ru=yahoo

(snip)

“The provision was inserted into the rescue legislation last week, at the behest of the FDIC, according to people familiar with the matter. The aim was to reduce the government’s exposure to Wachovia losses under the original Citigroup deal. Lawyers said the clause appears to defang the exclusivity pact between Wachovia and Citigroup.

(snip)

“Citigroup officials were caught off-guard by the provision, with senior officials not being aware of its existence until Friday afternoon—after President George W. Bush had already signed the bill into law. Citigroup executives argued that the provision also could invalidate Wachovia’s subsequent deal with Wells Fargo—an assertion that those banks dismissed.”

IOW, did Wachovia’s (i.e. Robert K. Steel’s) friends in the Treasury do him a special favor?

Is this going to pass muster?


10 posted on 10/05/2008 9:58:10 PM PDT by CondorFlight (I)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]


To: abb

fyi - post #10 might be of interest.


15 posted on 10/06/2008 12:10:58 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

To: CondorFlight
Lawyers said the clause appears to defang the exclusivity pact between Wachovia and Citigroup.

Can Congress retroactively void a contract that was legal and enforceable under US law at the time of signing?

16 posted on 10/06/2008 12:18:55 AM PDT by Ken H
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson