[jude24]

The doctor's scrip was in error ~ it didn't pass muster with the pharmacist. End of story.

Because of religion, not pharmacology.

And the old whore? Certainly you jest! And you are the one who said the old whore should be able to make a decision that the pharmacist should be bound to obey.

No. The patient (not whore - who she sleeps with is none of your damned business) and the physician chose a course of treatment. The pharmacist has no say in that course of business.

[muawiyah]

Hey, who she sleeps with IS public business when she trudges into the court of public opinion and tries to elicit sympathy. It's even more the public's business when she takes something like this to court.

BTW, pharmacists make decisions all the time (for a variety of reasons) about whether or not you are going to get a drug.

They aren't just window clerks ~ they are professionals who have knowledge of pharmacology ~ and it's usually vastly superior to that of any mere sawbones eh!