Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin: Obama Is ‘Palling Around With Terrorists’
http://news.google.com ^ | October 4, 2008, 4:54 pm | By Kate Phillips

Posted on 10/04/2008 2:34:37 PM PDT by Maelstorm

“There is a lot of interest, I guess, in what I read and what I’ve read lately. Well, I was reading my copy of today’s New York Times and I was interested to read about Barack’s friends from Chicago.

“I get to bring this up not to pick a fight, but it was there in the New York Times, so we are gonna talk about it. Turns out one of Barack’s earliest supporters is a man who, according to the New York Times, and they are hardly ever wrong, was a domestic terrorist and part of a group that quote launched a campaign of bombings that would target the Pentagon and US Capitol. Wow. These are the same guys who think patriotism is paying higher taxes.

“This is not a man who sees America as you see it and how I see America. We see America as the greatest force for good in this world. If we can be that beacon of light and hope for others who seek freedom and democracy and can live in a country that would allow intolerance in the equal rights that again our military men and women fight for and die for for all of us. Our opponent though, is someone who sees America it seems as being so imperfect that he’s palling around with terrorists who would target their own country?”

(Excerpt) Read more at news.google.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Colorado
KEYWORDS: obama; palin; weatherunderground; woodshed
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: Maelstorm

21 posted on 10/04/2008 3:23:18 PM PDT by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm
But the two men do not appear to have been close.

Ayers sponsored Obama's entry into politics. They served together on two separate boards for years. And they spent 150 million dollars together, on what?

So to pretend they merely bumped into one another while walking their dogs is humorous. But there is no reason to buy it.

22 posted on 10/04/2008 3:39:15 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
"Dick Cheney in a dress"

Count me in.

23 posted on 10/04/2008 3:40:05 PM PDT by marron
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

“There is a lot of interest, I guess, in what I read and what I’ve read lately. Well, I was reading my copy of today’s New York Times and I was interested to read about Barack’s friends from Chicago.

“I get to bring this up not to pick a fight, but it was there in the New York Times, so we are gonna talk about it. Turns out one of Barack’s earliest supporters is a man who, according to the New York Times, and they are hardly ever wrong, was a domestic terrorist...

BRILLIANT TURNAROUND


24 posted on 10/04/2008 3:41:46 PM PDT by Canedawg (If the law supposes that, said Mr. Bumble, the law is a ass, a idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg

Well Mccain has unleashed his best weapon now....it’s time to get back inside the loop...the suspending the campaign may have done short term damage, if MCCain gets his tail in gear!


25 posted on 10/04/2008 3:52:49 PM PDT by iopscusa (El Vaquero. (SC Lowcountry Cowboy))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

ROCK AND ROLL. AWESOME.


26 posted on 10/04/2008 4:04:55 PM PDT by FreedomProtector
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raynearhood

YEAH....creepy...like “ein Volk, ein Fuhrer” was creepy.
How long before “creepy” becomes “fanatical”?
There is something distinctly demonic about Obama. This goes beyond mere support for a political candidate. It’s entering the realm of idolatry.
Far from being a “uniter” as he claims to be, he is dividing America with each passing day.
Just my opinion, but I’ll stick by it.


27 posted on 10/04/2008 4:21:51 PM PDT by 95 Bravo ("Freedom is not free.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Canedawg
“I get to bring this up not to pick a fight, but it was there in the New York Times, so we are gonna talk about it. Turns out one of Barack’s earliest supporters is a man who, according to the New York Times, and they are hardly ever wrong, was a domestic terrorist...

Heh, heh, heh. Patch that up, NYT.

28 posted on 10/04/2008 5:47:21 PM PDT by pray4liberty (The Lord is on the side of the truly righteous.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: publius1
The common thread in most political propaganda I've seen is the use of MSM sourcing as proof of the argument's validity. Campaign commercials and responses to criticism share this trait. In this case (Ayers) we have more than the editorial opinion of a newspaper as evidence. The only way to use it in a timely manner would be to get out there and talk it up loud. Shove their half assed defense back up their ass from whence it came. Wrapped in the NYT, of course.
29 posted on 10/04/2008 6:59:34 PM PDT by Skid Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: mathprof

Got my votes.


30 posted on 10/04/2008 7:01:15 PM PDT by Skid Marx (I didn't say that.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Skid Marx
Got my votes.

"votes"? Are you a democrat troll? We only get one vote.

31 posted on 10/04/2008 7:04:13 PM PDT by mathprof
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Maelstorm

Below is link to info on Scott Shane, the NYT reporter who has just written an apologia/inoculation for Obama in regard to Bill Ayers - and of which, of course, media outlets have pantingly embraced.

It seems that Mr. Shane of the NYT has had previous experience in the apologia business: including that for JOE WILSON of PLAME fame.

http://www.timeswatch.org/twarticles/2005/20050725.asp


32 posted on 10/04/2008 7:06:06 PM PDT by mtntop3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathprof
heh heh
33 posted on 10/04/2008 7:11:49 PM PDT by Skid Marx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: mwl8787

From: http://wiki.answers.com/Q/Who_is_the_president_Pro-Tem_in_the_senate

Who is the president Pro-Tem in the senate?
In: US Presidents

Answer

Robert Byrd (D) West Virginia

____

Perhaps we have a case of you say pro temp and I say pro tem. We both mean the same deal.


34 posted on 10/05/2008 4:30:27 AM PDT by maica (Peace is the Aftermath of Victory)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson