Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Berlin_Freeper
All fine and dandy, but how about actually mentioning the name BILL AYERS. Let's get specific about WHAT terrorist and WHEN.

Take the ball to the hoop!

20 posted on 10/04/2008 12:05:52 PM PDT by ajwharton (FL GOP Pollwatcher, ACORN-buster)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: ajwharton

Hannity is helping tomorrow night with an hour long special on Obama and his terrorist friends. We need to alert everyone on our lists and keep this conversation going.


30 posted on 10/04/2008 12:08:16 PM PDT by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ajwharton
All fine and dandy, but how about actually mentioning the name BILL AYERS. Let's get specific about WHAT terrorist and WHEN.
Take the ball to the hoop!

There is also something to be said about letting it play on the imagination of the public for a short while.

Obama-Osama

33 posted on 10/04/2008 12:08:33 PM PDT by Berlin_Freeper (Sarah Palin 08 12 16 20)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ajwharton

...”but how about actually mentioning the name BILL AYERS. Let’s get specific about WHAT terrorist and WHEN.”

Another BINGO!!!


34 posted on 10/04/2008 12:08:53 PM PDT by bricklayer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ajwharton

And when ever Bill Ayers is mentioned, include his terrorist wife Bernadine Dohrn


40 posted on 10/04/2008 12:11:08 PM PDT by Son House (Palin, Has The Left Press Wailing! [MSNBC, ABC, CBS, CNN, New York Times,...])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ajwharton
This was the first salvo. The NYT has it on record "it was not a close relationship". Hopefully the info will get out about how close it really is!

Hannity's show, plus Mac's camp listing the "closeness", hopefully will blow the NYT's story right out of the water!

52 posted on 10/04/2008 12:14:01 PM PDT by tiredoflaundry (McCain/Palin '08 ----- It's October, SURPRISE ME!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ajwharton
All fine and dandy, but how about actually mentioning the name BILL AYERS.

Negative, negative. It's *much* better if she doesn't. By leaving it as a vague, matter-of-fact statement, it forces Obama to do one of two things.

1. Name Ayers as the terrorist in question, and define his relationship with him, publicly. This would only lead voters to a point of focus of that relationship, and open the door to Annenbaum, Rezko and other dark corners of Chicago politics.

2. Allow Palin to link him to 'terrorists', without any kind of response or defense, and let that sink in to the minds of the average voters. This would lead to massive degradation of Obama's credibility with independents, as their imagination runs with the idea that Obama pals around with terrorists.

No need to name names. This is a trap. Obama gets to choose his own fate. He can't run from this problem, and now that he's called out, he can't hide.

160 posted on 10/04/2008 12:56:41 PM PDT by Steel Wolf (Commander Barack "Spock" Obama, "But, Captain... that would be... illiberal...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

To: ajwharton

She got it right. Ayers isn’t the only one.


169 posted on 10/04/2008 1:00:06 PM PDT by rvoitier (Democrat--gateway ideology to Communism / It's the Revolution, Stupid!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson