Why?
There is a constitutional requirement that a president must satisfy.
All past presidents’ “proof” was their lives spent in open activity among people who knew them. Zero, on the other hand, has a life lived far from Americans for many years, with parentage not automatically conveying citizenship; a life charecterized by periods of unknown, hidden and covered up activity generally devoted to undermining our society and agrandizing himself. Without the obscurity and coverups this question would have never arrived. Then trying to palm off a fraudulent document to “prove” his case just adds fuel to the fire as do the lawyer-upping rather than just providing a legit document.
If his time and place are known and appropriate he certainly is giving his best imitation of one who cannot show that they allow him to be president. His grandmother in Kenya claims to have seen him being born in Kenya. If his time and place of birth are unverifiable he is not eligible to be President since our Constitution stipulates that natural citizenship is required. There is no “possibly” a natural citizen allowed.
No arguement there. The question is how this is satisfied. Making up requirements for Obama that not a single prior presidential candidate has had to meet isn't the way to do it. Perhaps out of this will come procedures that future presidential candidates have to meet, perhaps not. But changing the rules for Obama mid campaign, and basing your requirement on stories without any evidence backing them up is not legal. Until that changes you're just going to have to keep on digging.