Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Palin Suggests Obama Unqualified
Time ^

Posted on 10/03/2008 9:37:01 AM PDT by Chet 99

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last
To: Retired Greyhound

Thank God, huh? :)


21 posted on 10/03/2008 4:54:43 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BigBobber

This is great news! :)


22 posted on 10/03/2008 4:59:26 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

so we have a concensus...McCain, Palin and Biden are all convinced he’s not ready to be CIC.


23 posted on 10/03/2008 5:11:30 PM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Palin’s not running for CIC.


24 posted on 10/03/2008 5:15:11 PM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: 2ndDivisionVet; 4woodenboats; acapesket; AFPhys; Amityschild; aynrandfan; backhoe; beckysueb; ...
Palin Ping”



I knew all of you on the list would love to hear this. :)

I'll admit I was nervous last night, but I did remember something her parents said to each other at the Republican Convention, “Honey, she hasn't let us down, yet!”. So, I took a lot of comfort in that. Oh, and prayers of course! :)

And, we can say the same thing! LOL She hasn't let us down yet, either!

I thought some of you (and some on the thread here) might also want to take a look at these videos in case they had missed them earlier: Must See Related Video at YouTube:
"Sarah Palin: Meet the Parents" (National TV):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GqTu53wWnIA

Meet Sarah Palin's Parents [The Heaths]" (Local Alaskan Coverage from the day she was announced as McCain's Running Mate):
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tBnts1L0_WI

25 posted on 10/03/2008 5:36:45 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

As far as Palin not being “qualified” to call Obama “UNqualified”? I have to disagree with you — strongly. She more certainly is experienced, and incredibly more qualified than Obama at that!

Palin doesn’t pretend she has a lot of experience in “Washington Politics” like Obama likes to. In her debate last night, she said very clearly, “Look, I’ve only been at this for 5 weeks.”

What Sarah Palin does have is a lot of experience at an executive level making government work better, and getting rid of those who, like Obama, are imminently unqualified and dangerous.

Whereas, Obama has the AUDACITY to assume that HE has experience adequate enough to lead a major-party ticket. Palin is right. Obama is extremely dangerous in a position to hold the powers of President. His politcal career was launched in the home of a KNOWN COMMUNIST TERRORIST Bill Ayers [more info. at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Ayers].

Bill Ayers is the man who during the Vietnam War led the Weathermen Organization. This is the same terrorist group that bombed the Capitol building during the Vietnam War among other places [more info. at Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Weatherman_(organization) ]. in and article published on September 11, 2001 stated in a national news magazine that he said - and I quote - “Hadn’t bombed enough”. In his recent book he literally stated that he was, “guilty as hell” (and free on a technicality).

If that’s not dangerous, I don’t know what you could really say, IS dangerous! We are at war right now, and one of the countries in our world that is assisting those who are threatening us, and OUR allies, is Russia. They are the ones supplying Iran with equipment and such to create nuclear power, and thereby attain the materials they need to create the nuclear bomb they have threatened to wipe Israel off the map with.

The other day the Prime Minister of Russia, ex-Communist Party Member, and also the ex-President of Russia, Vladimir Putin said that “we [meaning the Soviets/Communists] should get back our Union”. Obama is a Marxist candidate who back in the supposed “old days” would be aligned with that same Union’s COMMUNIST government that Vladimir Putin has just told us he would like to reunite! AND, a union he already attempted to begin “re-procuring” by invading Georgia!

Again, if that is not dangerous - to let Obama and his friends, and advisors, and “comrades” getting control of the WHITE HOUSE and the Executive Branch of the United States Government - then I really don’t know what you could call dangerous!

Sarah sees that and she is right to point it out in no uncertain terms! And, she has the intelligence, and requisite life experience to represent the same “middle-class” people that Obama and his Marxist ilk would utterly DESTROY by instituting their Marxist/Leninist and COMMUNIST Propaganda.


26 posted on 10/03/2008 6:08:45 PM PDT by LibertyRocks ( http://LibertyRocks.wordpress.com ~ Pro-Palin & NObama Gear : http://cafepress.com/NO_ObamaBiden08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Palin’s not running for CIC.

Neither was George H.W. Bush in 1990. But three month's into Reagan's first term he almost wound up in the Oval Office. It's nice to say that Palin would have a learning curve but in the world we live in that may not be possible.

27 posted on 10/03/2008 6:43:34 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: LibertyRocks
As far as Palin not being “qualified” to call Obama “UNqualified”? I have to disagree with you — strongly. She more certainly is experienced, and incredibly more qualified than Obama at that!

You're standards for qualification are a whole lot lower than mine. As far as I can see, neither Palin nor Obama have the background and experience to be president. His lack of experience is only one of the many reasons I wouldn't vote for Obama. Her lack of experience is the primary reason why I think Palin was a poor choice.

28 posted on 10/03/2008 6:47:13 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; metmom; Fichori

Palin’s more qualified than Obama and Biden put together.

Biden’s a chronic liar with ideas like partitioning Iraq, and I can’t even begin to untangle his deluded grasp on hezbollah, hamas, Lebanon, the west bank and gaza he was stammering and muttering about last night incoherently.

But Obama has accused US troopps of air-raiding villages and killing civilians in Afghanistan.

He also thought Iran was a small insignificant non-dangerous country.

would yuk it up with his allies: cuba, venezuela, north korea, iran with NO pre-conditions...

As a matter of fact, in some ways I’d prefer Palin as CIC even over McCain!


29 posted on 10/03/2008 7:01:51 PM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur; metmom

Come to think of it George HW Bush was a bad example also, because he would have been ready. As director of the CIA, he would have been alot more prepared than a community organizer.

Palin’s got executive experience as both a mayor and a governor.


30 posted on 10/03/2008 7:09:37 PM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
Why do we have to boost Slime inc. hits to view a Fox story?

Isn't that a bit like tuning into al Jazerra to watch our congress debate on bills?

31 posted on 10/03/2008 7:31:17 PM PDT by 4woodenboats (W T H !!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YLlyjGjeZIY

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fU4sVQV3Lhk&eurl=http://cancelthebee.blogspot.com/2008/07/obama-lists-military-assets-he-will.html

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8sj91NH5fvw&feature=related


32 posted on 10/03/2008 7:31:48 PM PDT by narses (...the spirit of Trent is abroad once more.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther

Ha! I was just discussing this with someone else and how you could tell Biden was lying. So I googled it and got these links...

http://www.pattiwood.net/article.asp?PageID=2314

http://slcblues.blogspot.com/2008/09/your-lips-say-yes-yes-but-your-body.html

http://wendifriesen.wordpress.com/2008/08/13/is-john-edwards-lying-baby-his/

From all indications, Biden was lying through his teeth for the whole debate.


33 posted on 10/03/2008 8:08:02 PM PDT by metmom (Welfare was never meant to be a career choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

Maybe this will lead the MSM to the birth certificate issue.


34 posted on 10/03/2008 9:10:43 PM PDT by valkyry1 (McCain/Palin 2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Gov Palin is more qualified than ANY member of the UnAmerican Democrat Party that betrayed this country and our CIC during wartime.

Hussein and his party have stolen honor and victory from our troops, and defended Saddam and Sons to such a degree, that it was traitorous.

Gov Palin would never and has never committed acts such as these.

She is loyal to her country, unlike Barack Hussein Obama.

35 posted on 10/03/2008 9:19:59 PM PDT by roses of sharon (The MSM vampires must die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Palin’s more qualified than Obama and Biden put together.

I would disagree.

As a matter of fact, in some ways I’d prefer Palin as CIC even over McCain!

Again, I would disagree. I would sleep well at night with McCain as C-in-C. I would not with Palin or Obama in the role.

36 posted on 10/04/2008 5:59:28 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: tpanther
Palin’s got executive experience as both a mayor and a governor.

Whoop-de-do. Jimmy Carter had twice the executive experience as Palin, by your lights he should have been a bang-up president. Clinton had five times as much executive experience. I wouldn't hold either one up as much of a success.

37 posted on 10/04/2008 6:01:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

Ummmm hypocrat Jimmuh Cahtuh disqualified himself by the very fact he was a hypocrat...and history vindicates this. We’re still paying decades later for his failed liberal ideas.

We have to choose a president/vp from these four people:

McCain/Palin vs. Obama/Biden.

OR sit it out.

Sitting it out won’t stop one of these 2 pairs from being elected though.


38 posted on 10/04/2008 8:13:36 AM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: sarasota
Biden not only mixed up which Article in the Constitution is the Executive (he said Article I and that is Legislative, the branch he has been a member of for 36 years); but his entire point was that the VP role was Executive because the Article of the Constitution it is in is the Executive article. WRONG AGAIN. The VP role is mentioned in BOTH Article I and II.

So he not only mixed them up, his entire point was bogus.

If Palin had made any one of Bidens mistakes (Hezbollah out of Lebanon at some point in the past? Hezbollah a “legitimate part of the government”? Article I and II mix up. VP in both Articles mix up. FDR president in 1929 and on TV mix up.) or his lies (too numerous to name) she would be dubbed “Not ready to be a heartbeat away from the Presidency”.

39 posted on 10/04/2008 8:20:04 AM PDT by allmendream (Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! Sa-RAH! RAH RAH RAH! McCain/Palin2008)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

The thing about McCain is he can be stubborn and sometimes a hot-head. So it would depend on the situation. (I would almost prefer a hothead with the Iranians but maybe not so much with the Russians.)

Meanwhile I think Palin would listen to her advisors/generals...whereas Obama/Biden would listen to the generals & advisors and then do precisely the opposite.


40 posted on 10/04/2008 8:20:36 AM PDT by tpanther (All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing. Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson