Is the issue only his Hawaiian birth certificate? Or is the issue Article II of the Constitution?
***The issue is whether he’s natural born, per the requirements for eligibility of the president in the constitution. If he’s natural born and an Indonesian citizen, it won’t matter much because I’m sure the courts and all the liberals in guvmint will just fall all over themselves to allow him a pass on whatever is needed.
So, basically if he produces a birth certificate to whomever asks, the same way McCain has done, the issue goes away for him. Guys like me will move on to some other aspect of this campaign and the only ones left will be real serious Berg/Truther/crackpots. It’s Simple to produce it if he has it. But he hasn’t done it. And it appears to be costing him, so if this was all some kind of trap, he should have sprung it by now.
Ok. But all Article II says is "natural born." There seems to be some argument as to exactly what qualifies one to be "natural born."
If he’s natural born and an Indonesian citizen, it won’t matter much...
But according to Berg's lawsuit, that matters a great deal. Berg argues that if he is or ever was an Indonesian citizen, or even a Kenyan citizen by virtue of his father's citizenship, that disqualifies him as being "natural born," and that his being born in Hawaii is irrelevant.
But if that doesn't matter to you, then why does it matter whether he was born in Hawaii or not?
I'm just trying to make sense of what you're trying to say.