It is evidence that 0bama has produced an unacceptable form of identification, and has not produced the origiunal, which is required by law.
Unless the required original, authentic document is produced by 0bama, how can the court rule in favor of 0bama?
You and I are required as much. 0bama must be held to the same standards.
How is it evidence that Obama has produced an unacceptable form of identification?
Obama says he was born in Honolulu.
He produced what he claims is a certificate issued by the State of Hawaii showing that he was born in Honolulu.
The AP photo of the Jakarta school record shows that he was born in Honolulu.
So I fail to see how the AP photo is evidence that Obama produced an unacceptable form of identification. The information in the AP photo is consistent with Obama's claim that he was born in Honolulu.