Actually, the first time I was banned, pissant, and I believe even yourself said that I shouldn't be banned. That was just moments before I was banned.
***Here’s the thing to keep in mind. It’s Phil Berg’s website, his own private property, just like this here freeper thingy is JimRob’s kitchen.
Absolutely. I would be the first to say that the First Amendment doesn't apply to private systems such as this.
However that doesn't change the fact that Berg publicly stated on his own website that he welcomed people to voice their comments there and that to do so was a right of free speech guaranteed by the Constitution.
Point being that Berg did nothing more than cynically wrap himself in the Constitution while feeding people a load of crap.
***Give them time... ;-)
Hehehe. Well, there's not really much opportunity. It seems this is all that's been said of the case over there since August 25th (by Larry Johnson):
Some are getting their shorts in a knot because I have not put up a piece on the Phil Berg law suit filed last week in Philadelphia challenging the candidacy of Barack Obama. The reason is simple. The case has been filed and there is nothing to report until the judge makes a decision and requires discovery. I wish Phil the best, but want to keep the focus on other issues for now. If the case moves forward we will cover it extensively. Okay?
With Johnson having been burned on such things as the "Whitey tape," Techdude, and the Hawaiian birth certificate in the name of Barry Soetoro, it seems he's not wanting to touch the Berg case with a ten foot pole.
Actually, the first time I was banned, pissant, and I believe even yourself said that I shouldn’t be banned. That was just moments before I was banned.
*** I suppose this means you’ll be banned soon again... but don’t say that conservatives aren’t tolerant because Pissant & I are among the most conservative. GMTA.