Ok, I could understand that if Berg had in fact said what you were claiming he said, i.e. that all Obama had to do was produce his birth certificate. But I haven't seen him say such a thing nor have I seen him actually quoted as having said such a thing. Also, there's nothing in what he's filed with the court that would indicate he would say such a thing.
I've been doing some Googling tonight trying to find something but haven't turned up anything.
I was also annoyed by your request for proof.
Ok. Not sure why you'd find that annoying, but at least you're being honest about it.
Lotsa vectors pointed towards troll, with your new startup date & attitude. But as long as you know what you’re talking about, you’ll most likely be allowed to stick around. I can’t speak for others’ annoyance, but I know it’s there. Freepers are often generally annoyed by a newbie with a showoff attitude and a big mouth.
I don't get the "showoff attitude and a big mouth." Or the hostility toward people simply because they're new posters. It seems a good way to quickly turn new posters into non-posters.
But just keep answering and you’ll withstand any harsh wind coming your way.
But why should there be any harsh wind in the first place?
I've noticed that this place is soliciting contributions. But why would someone be inclined to contribute if they're met with harsh winds just because they're a new poster?
So... answer the question about your motives, newbie.
No motives other than my having become interested in the Berg lawsuit and have been reading it and posting about it.
But why should there be any harsh wind in the first place?
***We get a lot of annoying trolls here.
I’ve noticed that this place is soliciting contributions. But why would someone be inclined to contribute if they’re met with harsh winds just because they’re a new poster?
***You’re not getting a harsh wind JUST because you’re new. It’s because you’re new and you’re annoying and you disagree over minor points and you are acting a lot like a troll. That’s basically classic troll behavior. But real trolls stop posting answers to questions, and their answers simply don’t make sense. It appears you have this unique perspective based upon legal musings and you seem to be able to defend it on the basis of facts & argumentation. If you are still a troll, you’re at least a knowledgeable one and that’s worth keeping in my book. Do you want to see the difference between conservatives and liberals? Go and register today at Democratic Underground and start disagreeing with them on something like this. See how long you last and how polite they are with you, and make up your own mind about which site tolerates dissent better.
Kevmo: So... answer the question about your motives, newbie.
Peerless: No motives other than my having become interested in the Berg lawsuit and have been reading it and posting about it.
***Well, there’s plenty here to be interested in. Are you a lawyer? You argue like one. Most of us freepers are not lawyers, we’re conservative activists.