[Peerless]

Here’s what I’ll do. Polarik is in touch with Berg, his analysis is on the website. We’ll ask Polarik to have Berg clarify this little minor teensy weensy point.

Don't you think a public statement by Berg himself would be better? Then there can be no question.

If what you say is correct, then Berg will lose all support from PUMA and us right wingers as well as a pissed off judge, so he would find it a very bumpy road should he be parsing his words on this item.

Sad to say, but Berg's worst enemy seems to be Berg himself.

[Steve Van Doorn]

I just asked my wife to clarify this who is not drunk and has a master’s degree in English.
She was annoyed with your statement “as it was used…” It was not used she says. But she does say, constitution is very vague statement and can be interpreted different ways.