But that's not what Berg stated in the article you posted, as I have pointed out to you.
So, his case has huge holes in it, and the fact you’re focusing on this small matter compared to the real big stuff is quizzical, especially when it gets pointed out to you that Berg will drop the suit.
No, it is you who is focusing on a small matter compared to the real big stuff.
Again, Berg did not say he would drop the suit if Obama simply produced a Hawaiian birth certificate. You keep overlooking the "real big stuff" of Berg's claiming that Obama lost whatever US citizenship he had when his mother married Soetoro and moved to Indonesia where Obama acquired Indonesian citizenship.
And this is precisely why Berg is asking for more than just a Hawaiian birth certificate as you keep trying to claim, but also a certified copies of his certification of citizenship and his oath of allegiance.
OK, I wasn’t clear on this point. You’re trying to steer the conversation to this minor little thing in Berg’s lawsuit which is subordinate to the birth certificate, even by Berg’s public statements.
You haven't shown me a public statement made by Berg in which he says he will drop the suit if all Obama does is produce his Hawaiian birth certificate.
Berg himself says it wouldn't matter if he does due to Berg's claim of Indonesian citizenship.
You’re speculating on this minor legal point about Indonesian dual citizenship trumping the birth certificate...
I'm not speculating at all on that point. Berg lays it out in clear black and white. Here it is again in case you missed it the first couple of times around:
Even if Obama was, in fact, born in Hawaii, he lost his U.S. citizenship when his mother re-married and moved to Indonesia with her Indonesian husband.
This says in unequivocal terms that Obama's producing a Hawaiian birth certificate would ultimately be irrelevant to his case as it would have absolutely no bearing at all on his claims with regard to Indonesian citizenship.
What is your motive, when you swallow the camel of Dudley Dooright and Berg’s public statements but strain at a gnat of Indonesian dual citizenship?
And I would ask what is your motive when you misrepresent what Berg has said publicly, and completely ignore what he has said in his own lawsuit?
And I would ask what is your motive when you misrepresent what Berg has said publicly, and completely ignore what he has said in his own lawsuit?
***You first, newbie.