Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Historix
More than half of the whopping $426.9 million Barack Obama has raised has come from small donors whose names the Obama campaign won't disclose.

Don't they, by election law, have to disclose those donor's names?
3 posted on 10/02/2008 9:27:18 AM PDT by TexasGreg ("Democrats Piss Me Off")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: TexasGreg

Who knows? The rules don’t apply to Obama. And the Federal Election Commission is still broken, since Harry Reid has refused to bring the nominees up for a vote, so they have lacked a quorum for this past year.

The Left Wing Media won’t ask Obama to release ANY information, including his birth certificate, his academic records, his law clients, his connections with the Chicago Mafia, Black Muslims, and Communist terrorists—or anything else.

So why should he release the names of contributors or return money donated by Palestinian terrorists and the like?


5 posted on 10/02/2008 9:33:48 AM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: TexasGreg

From what I understand, if you donate under $200 then your name doesn’t have to be disclosed. The charge is that they are creating a bunch of bogus names and breaking up foreign donations so that they fall under the $200. McCain has chosen to disclose all names even if he doesn’t have to.

This entire thing stinks to high heaven. MSM, foreign money, ACORN, etc.


11 posted on 10/02/2008 9:42:15 AM PDT by trtdenver (Email ABCNEWS at once)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson