Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: marktwain
People cannot legislate away the threat of an attack by mad men. If this mad man in Finland couldn't have legally obtained a pistol to carry out his insanity, he would've probably used a shotgun or an illegally obtained pistol.

What's the answer to this dilemma? I don't know, but I do know that when law abiding citizens are threatened by madmen, the answer to the problem is not for their elected government to disarm law abiding citizens.

2 posted on 10/02/2008 4:45:05 AM PDT by DJ Taylor (Once again our country is at war, and once again the Democrats have sided with our enemy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DJ Taylor

Ban Handguns? You’d think these people never heard of a “sawed off” shotgun!


3 posted on 10/02/2008 4:54:19 AM PDT by catman67
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: DJ Taylor

This is an old argument about guns. How do you keep them out of the hands of madmen? The answer that I arrived at years ago is that is the price of freedom. To keep the Government’s snout out of it occasionally the system will fail and someone irresponsible will get their hands on a weapon. Then it is up to the citizenry to rectify the problem.

As armed person is a citizen. An unarmed person is a serf. It is as simple as that.


19 posted on 10/02/2008 5:46:10 AM PDT by Citizen Tom Paine (Swift as the wind; Calmly majestic as a forest; Steady as the mountains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson