Replies

Can't help you on the authenticity of the email as John and I aren't exactly on speaking terms these days. /;-)

And with messages like this we won't be on "speaking terms" for quite sometime.

He, like so many and in both political parties, just don't seem to "get it".

Being "responsible", either at the personal, business, and/or government level means one must manage their own "debt" and not let debt manage them. Unfortunately for far too long now Washington politicians have had no problem passing on their irresponsibility to future generations. It must quit sometime, so why not the present?

I mean if Sonic can't grow without loans - that is their problem.

If school age kids can't go to college or vo-tech without borrowing the money - get a job, save up and then go - guarantee their education will mean much more to them.

If people who couldn't afford to buy homes did so for what ever reason and are now losing them - well tough dooty. That's life.

Why should those of us who have played by the rules, accepted personal responsibility, especially for our financial situations, continually be asked to "bail out" folks that haven't?

Eh, Johnny boy?

Excuse me while I go barf up the meal I just paid for!