Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: griswold3
someone needs to explain this in terms people can understand

Company A issues a bond.

Company B places a bet that Company A will default on the bond.

Company C takes B's bet and similar bets from lots of other companies.

Company C books enormous profits on the business.

Company A defaults on the Bond.

Company B is rich.

Company C is up the creek.

17 posted on 09/30/2008 2:30:03 PM PDT by trad_anglican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: trad_anglican
Company A defaults on the Bond.

Company B is rich.

Company C is up the creek.

Or, Company C has taken so many bad bets that it is unable to make good on the claim, and files for bankruptcy. Then:

Company A is up the creek (it must be since it defaulted on the original bond)

Company B is up the creek (no payment possible from C) and

Company C is up the creek also since it's now in bankruptcy from misjudging the level of risk on all the bets it made.

Jack

20 posted on 09/30/2008 3:35:44 PM PDT by JackOfVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

To: trad_anglican
Great explanation.

Company C takes B's bet and similar bets from lots of other companies.

Goes a long way towards explaining the downside market impact of CDS'. Unlike normal insurance, where the loss on the insured asset is limited to the asset value itself, the exposure of Company C is more like the exposure of a bookie - limited only by the number of bets they took.

21 posted on 09/30/2008 3:43:41 PM PDT by freeandfreezing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson