[itsthejourney]

OMG. Prayers for the children.

Why was she still getting government checks to care for adopted children? Foster care, sure. But surely not after she adopted them or is the state that messed up.

[murphE]

Subsidized adoption.

[WayneS]

"Why was she still getting government checks to care for adopted children?"

Because D.C. and the State of Maryland allow dead-beat welfare recipients to adopt children, that's why. And this policy leads DIRECTLY to the situation at hand.

It is evident that this woman "adopted" these children for the sole purpose of killing them and continuing to draw welfare to "take care" of them. As I said in my earlier post - BEYOND evil.

[grellis]

I'm pretty sure that subsidized adoption is common in many states. Primarily, it allows for (WHAT SHOULD BE!) a family to give a permanent home to older children, children with "issues" (mental, physical, etc) or basically any child who might not otherwise be considered for adoption. I'm not taking a side on the issue, just trying to explain it in brief.

This woman, this thing...she never should have been given the opportunity to foster, let alone adopt a child.

I don't wish her the death penalty. What an easy way out. God forgive me for feeling this way, but I hope her cellies torture her for many, many long years.