Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: pobeda1945

At mach 5 I think you can presume a couple of things.
1. It’s not going to be making right turns. The turns will be gradual.
2. It will expend enormous amounts of fuel. Which will make it short range. Nothing like a cruise missile (1500 miles+).

I had a friend that worked for thee FAA he use to watch SR71s turn. He said it took about two states for that maneuver. That was at about Mach 2.5.

Honestly, I didn’t see anything in the article to tell me why it is ‘uninterceptable’. It’s just fast. Short range. smaller warhead. Won’t be in production for four years. Which means we will have perfected our short range lasers by then.

Also check out Phalanx (CIWS) Block 1B LPWS Testing and Firing
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cgpQBZF2sZQ

At that speed you only need a small dent or blemish to make it all come apart.

During the Star Wars days the solution the Russians had for our ICBMS was to blow up a thousand pounds of sand in an orbit going east to west. You don’t need to be sophisticated. It’s just more impressive.

For 18,000 mph
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terminal_High_Altitude_Area_Defense


85 posted on 09/30/2008 7:03:10 PM PDT by cruise_missile (''Edward - Jones:High commissions for lousy investment advice! Making cents out of $.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: cruise_missile

And what exactly is a cruise missile??Is it something that’s defined by range alone?

http://www.fas.org/nuke/intro/cm/index.html


89 posted on 09/30/2008 10:44:15 PM PDT by sukhoi-30mki
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson