Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cruise_missile

Just need to explode some chaff in front of it. The kinetic energy will take it out. Also, can’t out run a laser. -

“Bullet speed” is one thing. Reaction time to incoming missile is another. If defense system has only several seconds to detect, calculate, target and fire then ... you can “out run” a laser.


51 posted on 09/29/2008 9:32:36 PM PDT by pobeda1945
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: pobeda1945

Check out the YAL-1.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airborne_Laser

It can hit things far faster than MACH 5.


54 posted on 09/29/2008 9:49:05 PM PDT by cruise_missile (''Edward - Jones:High commissions for lousy investment advice! Making cents out of $.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: pobeda1945

Not to mention the possibility of a electromagnetic railgun-type weapon. They’re already well past Mach 5. They’re also not all that far off in terms of deployability, especially in something that a ship could carry and supply with power.


62 posted on 09/29/2008 11:13:39 PM PDT by Mr Inviso
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

To: pobeda1945
“Bullet speed” is one thing.

Yup. NASA has a 50 cal. that fires at 16,000 mph (23,467 fps) but, alas, it is 'fixed' placement.

66 posted on 09/30/2008 4:18:35 AM PDT by houeto ("Drill Here! Drill Now!" & "Go Palin, Go!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson