Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Hubble Space Telescope Suffers Serious Failure (STS-125 Save the Hubble mission off 'til February?)
Space.com on Yahoo ^ | 9/29/08 | Tariq Malik

Posted on 09/29/2008 12:55:52 PM PDT by NormsRevenge

A serious equipment failure aboard the Hubble Space Telescope is preventing it from relaying data and images to scientists on Earth and will likely delay a shuttle mission to overhaul the observatory next month, NASA officials said Monday.

The glitch occurred Saturday in one of two sides of a device known as a Control Unit/Science Data Formatter that is responsible for sending data from Hubble to scientists on Earth, said Allard Beutel, a NASA spokesperson at the agency's Kennedy Space Center in Cape Canaveral, Fla., where the shuttle Atlantis was being primed for an Oct. 14 launch.

"The hardware failed, it's unrecoverable," Beutel told SPACE.com. "They did testing and it's no longer fixable from the ground."

Side A of the data formatter failed Saturday, with flight controllers in the Hubble's control center at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., working to switch to the backup Side B to regain data relay capabilities. The data formatter is vital to science operations for Hubble, which had been using the Side A unit since it launched in 1990.

"It's used to store and transmit all the science data from all the instruments," Beutel said.

The malfunction will delay NASA's plans to launch Atlantis and a seven-astronaut crew to Hubble next month to perform an intense overhaul aimed at extending the observatory's mission life through at least 2013.

"Fixing the problem will result in delaying next month's Hubble servicing mission," NASA officials said in a statement. The mission has suffered a series of slight setbacks recently due to schedule slips from Hurricane Ike and payload delivery issues, and could be delayed to early February to allow more time to fix the new glitch.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: hubble; nasa; savethehubble; sts125
Save the Hubble!


nasa,esa,hubble heritage team

Arp 148, nicknamed Mayall's object, is the aftermath of an encounter between two galaxies, resulting in a ring-shaped galaxy and a long-tailed companion. The collision between the two parent galaxies produced a shockwave effect that first drew matter into the center and then caused it to propagate outwards in a ring. Arp 148 is located in the constellation of Ursa Major, the Great Bear, approximately 500 million light-years away.


1 posted on 09/29/2008 12:55:53 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

I highly recommend checking out the set of Hubble colliding galaxies pics they have over at Space.com

Hubble Photos: When Galaxies Collide
http://www.space.com/php/multimedia/imagegallery/igviewer.php?imgid=5051&gid=373


2 posted on 09/29/2008 1:00:25 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


NASA, ESA, the Hubble Heritage Team

Arp 272 is a remarkable collision between two spiral galaxies,
NGC 6050 and IC 1179, and is part of the Hercules Galaxy
Cluster, located in the constellation Hercules. The two spiral
galaxies, linked by their swirling arms, are located about 450
million light-years from Earth.

3 posted on 09/29/2008 1:04:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: KevinDavis

STS-125 delay ,, major HST system failure

better it broke now than a day or two after they launched. ;-)


4 posted on 09/29/2008 1:07:56 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

From what I read, they had a redundant component.

Side A failed.

Side B was switched on.

The system has no further backup for that component, but it still is working.

Yet, the article indicates it isn’t.

I IZ CUNFUZED.


5 posted on 09/29/2008 1:12:49 PM PDT by UCANSEE2 (The Last Boy Scout)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: UCANSEE2

Thanks!

sounds like they can cut to a backup but it takes a lot of work, and who knows what then.. glad this failed when it did.

snip from press release..

Additional testing demonstrates Side A no longer supports the transfer of science data to the ground. A transition to the redundant Side B should restore full functionality to the science instruments and operations.

The transition to Side B operations is complex.

http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/shuttle/main/index.html

NASA to Discuss Hubble Anomaly and Servicing Mission Launch Delay

Sept. 29, 2008
NASA will host a media teleconference at 6 p.m. EDT today to discuss a significant Hubble Space Telescope anomaly that occurred this weekend affecting the storage and transmittal of science data to Earth. Fixing the problem will delay next month’s space shuttle Atlantis’ Hubble servicing mission. To listen to the teleconference live, go to www.nasa.gov/newsaudio.

As a result of the launch delay, NASA has postponed the planned Oct. 3 Flight Readiness Review and subsequent news conference. The review will occur at a later date.

The malfunctioning system is Hubble’s Control Unit/Science Data Formatter - Side A. Shortly after 8 p.m. on Saturday, Sept. 27, the telescope’s spacecraft computer issued commands to safe the payload computer and science instruments when errors were detected within the Science Data Formatter. An attempt to reset the formatter and obtain a dump of the payload computer’s memory was unsuccessful.

Additional testing demonstrates Side A no longer supports the transfer of science data to the ground. A transition to the redundant Side B should restore full functionality to the science instruments and operations.

The transition to Side B operations is complex. It requires that five other modules used in managing data also be switched to their B-side systems. The B-sides of these modules last were activated during ground tests in the late 1980’s and/or early 1990, prior to launch.

The Hubble operations team has begun work on the Side B transition and believes it will be ready to reconfigure Hubble later this week. The transition will happen after the team completes a readiness review.

Hubble could return to science operations in the immediate future if the reconfiguration is successful. Even so, the agency is investigating the possibility of flying a back-up replacement system, which could be installed during the servicing mission.


6 posted on 09/29/2008 3:16:46 PM PDT by NormsRevenge (Semper Fi ... Godspeed ... Capitol Switchboard: (202) 224-3121)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: markman46; AntiKev; wastedyears; ALOHA RONNIE; RightWhale; anymouse; Brett66; SunkenCiv; ...

7 posted on 09/29/2008 5:28:21 PM PDT by KevinDavis (McCain/Palin 08 Palin/Jindal 12)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Oh my God, that’s a beautiful picture.


8 posted on 09/29/2008 8:16:31 PM PDT by wastedyears (Now sadly living in the DPRNYC [Brooklyn])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Here's another Stellar Beauty!


9 posted on 09/30/2008 8:06:28 AM PDT by Young Werther (Julius Caesar (Quae Cum Ita Sunt. Since these things are so.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

There’s a poor design somewhere in here. Why include a B-side if it is such a pain-in-the-neck to switch over? All of our instruments have redundant command & data handling electronics, and we designed them so it is no issue to switch from one to the other, and routinely run them separately or together. Maybe it’s just a drawback of such old designs (Hubble was designed in the late seventies/early eighties).


10 posted on 10/03/2008 9:17:32 PM PDT by MikeD (We live in a world where babies are like velveteen rabbits that only become real if they are loved.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Why don’t we just build a new one?


11 posted on 10/03/2008 9:19:24 PM PDT by PureSolace (God save us all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson