Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Winner of the First Debate: Jim Lehrer
Rasmussen ^

Posted on 09/28/2008 11:47:38 AM PDT by Chet 99

Saturday, September 27, 2008

The winner of the first Presidential debate was moderator and PBS television personality Jim Lehrer. After earlier polls showing that most voters expect the moderators to be biased, 76% say Lehrer was neutral. Seven percent (7%) thought he tried to help Obama, 3% thought he tried to help McCain and 14% were not sure.

Among those who watched the entire debate, 85% thought Lehrer maintained his neutrality.

As for the candidates, 36% thought Obama won, 33% gave the advantage to McCain, and 31% were not sure. Partisans in the electorate lined up behind their candidate in a way that would make spin room handlers proud. By a 67% to 3% margin, Obama supporters thought he won the debate. By a 73% to 2% margin, McCain voters thought their man came out ahead (crosstabs available for Premium Members).

Overall, ratings for the debate were down, possibly because of the Friday night scheduling. Fifty-five percent (55%) of likely voters say they watched the entire event and 12% said they saw none of it.

Five percent (5%) of voters say the debate changed how they would vote, but the changes were equally divided between Obama and McCain supporters. Saturday interviews for the Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll—the first post debate interviews--suggest that little has changed following the debate and Obama retains a modest lead over McCain.

While the debate was scheduled to focus on national security issues, the first 39 minutes were spent discussing the economic turmoil that has shaken the nation. Forty-four percent (44%) of voters say they agree with Obama’s view on the proposed bailout bill while 40% agree with McCain. Other research shows that opposition to the bailout legislation continues to grow and voters are cynical about the motives of their political leaders.


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2008debates; lehrer; pbs

1 posted on 09/28/2008 11:47:38 AM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

They need to ask Sgt. Ryan D. Jopek’s mother and father who they thought won the debate.


2 posted on 09/28/2008 11:50:04 AM PDT by FlingWingFlyer (Obama - The Next Josef Stalin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
I thought Lehrer was extremely condescending when he constantly harped at the candidates to "talk to one another".

According to my count, McCain looked at Obama exactly once during the debate. Snicker.

3 posted on 09/28/2008 11:54:47 AM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: what's up
According to my count, McCain looked at Obama exactly once during the debate. Snicker.

Don't blame him.

4 posted on 09/28/2008 11:56:16 AM PDT by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
Winner of the First Debate: Jim Lehrer

Who was the last presidential debate moderator that was not a liberal. I can't think of one, ever.

5 posted on 09/28/2008 12:06:17 PM PDT by RJL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

I thought Lahrer did a good job. I certainly like the format better than previous formats.


6 posted on 09/28/2008 12:08:13 PM PDT by Paperdoll (Duncan L.Huntr for Secretary of Defense!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll

I too liked this format.
susie


7 posted on 09/28/2008 12:37:17 PM PDT by brytlea (Obama--Keep the change!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: what's up
I thought Lehrer was extremely condescending when he constantly harped at the candidates to "talk to one another".

According to my count, McCain looked at Obama exactly once during the debate.

Did he not also command them to look at one another? I can't find it in the transcript.

8 posted on 09/28/2008 12:41:06 PM PDT by taraytarah (If your only strategy is attacking the life choices of 17-year-old females, you got nothin'.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
I thought Lahrer did a good job.

I agree, I thought it was going to be another OHB love-fest but Lehrer seemed impartial and it was nice not having to scream at the TV for a change.

9 posted on 09/28/2008 12:42:29 PM PDT by softwarecreator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: softwarecreator

Very surprised that Lahrer was even handed


10 posted on 09/28/2008 12:54:29 PM PDT by Dan Walsh (Bolton for VP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99
Is there anyone from the McCain/Palin campaign here in Freerepublic ?
Hello ? are you listneing ???????
If you are listening ???
Please if you can ? please talk to John and tell him, the next time John McCain has a debate with old slick Obama.. that the next time Obama tries to pull the old pitting the Rich against the poor worn out Dem class warfare tactic guilt trip of lowering taxes for the rich and wealthy .... that John McCain needs to turn around and say to Mr. Obama :


" Mr. Obama ??? "
" that old worn out tactic of class warfare of you accusing me of lowering taxes for the rich and wealthy is getting very old like your poor and tasteless TV ads of ridiculing me of not using a computer."
" Mr. Obama ? DON'T you dare lecture me with your false statements of lowering taxes for the wealthy when I want to create more jobs to help American's get back on their feet "
" Mr Obama ? Don't you dare lecture me, when ? some of the most wealthy people in America are from your own Democrat Party ... and some of them live in Follywood "
" Were are some of your rich and wealthy people of the Democrat party helping poor people out with their mortgages ? or buying them houses ? "
Don't you dare lecture me Mr. Obama if your own people are not out helping the poor.

Now if John McCain were to say that, he would win the debate hands down.. and take away one of Obama's BS talking points.
11 posted on 09/28/2008 12:56:12 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paperdoll
I agree -- Lahrer was good. The only thing I found objectionable was Lahrer's slip when he asked how the candidates would "rule" as president. US presidents govern, they don't rule.

I also liked the format. Too bad McCain and Obama didn't take advantage of it.

12 posted on 09/28/2008 1:03:47 PM PDT by Niord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: what's up
Lahrer didn't strike me as condescending — I thought he was earnest in trying to get the candidates to engage one another — to get away from 2-minute canned answers.
13 posted on 09/28/2008 1:09:54 PM PDT by Niord
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Niord
I don't need them to engage according to the moderator's dictates. I need them to state their positions and bash their opponent's.

Media people are always trying to achieve a kumbaya-fest. I liked that McCain hardly looked at Obama and treated him like a young upstart.

It may not work in the other debates but I found it refreshing in this one and I was glad he ignored Lehrer's numerous promptings.

14 posted on 09/28/2008 1:23:34 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: RJL
Winner of the First Debate: Jim Lehrer
Who was the last presidential debate moderator that was not a liberal. I can't think of one, ever.
Journalists aren't "liberal," they are "objective." Of course, they define "objective" as being directly opposed to American conservatism, best expressed by Theodore Roosevelt in his famous
"It is not the critic who counts . . . the credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena
Of course, journalists define "liberal" the same way - except that "objective" is always applied to journalists, and "liberal" is never applied to journalists.

So in reality the moderators are uniformly hostile to conservatives. It's my settled opinion that the only "moderator" of a debate should be a chess timer controlling the microphones.


15 posted on 09/28/2008 6:45:54 PM PDT by conservatism_IS_compassion (The conceit of journalistic objectivity is profoundly subversive of democratic principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Prophet in the wilderness

If McCain were to say all of that, he would not only win the debate, he would win the election. But he won’t say it. He’ll be speaking in the gentlemanly tones of Papa Bush 1992, and Bob Dole 1996. Business as usual. just like today’s votes. Two days later and I don’t remember anything Mac said during the debate, so it’s true, Jim Lehrer did win the debate.


16 posted on 09/28/2008 6:52:46 PM PDT by Revolting cat! (Are you ready to pray for Teddy?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Revolting cat!

Yeah Jim wanted the two to rouse it up a little.


17 posted on 09/29/2008 1:46:46 PM PDT by Prophet in the wilderness (PSALM .53 : 1 The FOOL hath said in his heart, there is no GOD.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: what's up

He struck as being ready for the old folks home. Just ask the questions and STFU.


18 posted on 09/29/2008 1:51:54 PM PDT by wordsofearnest ("The fundamental solution (w/b) that there is no longer any need to immigrate")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson