This is an outrageous implication. As a Nevadan (non-native), I am fairly well versed in the ways of gaming. To imply that McCain (or anyone, for that matter) could be bribed through a good night at the tables is not only libelous, but utterly ridiculous.
To imply that McCain (or anyone, for that matter) could be bribed through a good night at the tables is not only libelous, but utterly ridiculous.Not to mention the honesty and integrity of not just that casino but ALL casinos.
To suggest a casino has some control over table games is pure ignorance.
And, how would any casual observer know that an entire "entourage" was winners?