Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AndyJackson
Section 241 is better than 242, because 18-242, in the part omitted in your quote says "...on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens,..."

Unless a case could be made for a racial aspect, then 242 does not apply, and we have to go with 241

224 posted on 09/27/2008 2:54:21 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 ("In a time of universal deceit, telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -- George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625
Hate to quibble, but you need to parse 18-242, carefully, wrt the placement of commas and antecedent clauses.

The part you are concerned about reads: or to different punishments, pains, or penalties, on account of such person being an alien, or by reason of his color, or race, than are prescribed for the punishment of citizens,

In the plain language of this section, the antecedent controlled by race, nationality or color is different punisments, pains or penalties.

The depravation of constitutional rights applies to anyone. The same civil provisions in USC 42 § 1983 were part of the case against Nifong, etc. the plaintiff's of which were very decidedly white.

226 posted on 09/27/2008 3:09:26 PM PDT by AndyJackson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson