Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: dashing doofus
"jumpstart" is too strong. Stabilize and prevent further declines is what I would hope for

Correct. I did use the wrong word. I am certainly not looking for housing prices to do a fast turn up. I would be happy with stabilization as well.

To tell you the truth, when I consider that a $300 billion housing bill was just passed a few weeks ago with hardly the batting of an eyelash, I am not appalled at the $700 billion figure to get us out of a real jam. Sure, spending is a large problem and we need to shrink it and I think McCain may just be the guy to do it. But I just don't find this 700 B figure the apocalypse that most are declaring, especially since as you say I see a lot of it being recovered.

151 posted on 09/26/2008 1:13:28 PM PDT by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 136 | View Replies ]


To: what's up

If it were up to me, whatever passes, this or a guaranty of some sort, the takers must share the pain. I would put all of the executives on a govenment level payroll. No more multimillion dollar salaries — $200K or so. No dividends to stockholders. A hold on stock options.

The people running these companies should make millions while taxpayers are at risk, and their shareholders should also take a hit. If they can repay the money, I don’t care if they pay their executives $1 billion a year, but not if they are playing with OUR MONEY.


155 posted on 09/26/2008 1:18:27 PM PDT by dashing doofus (Those who are too smart to engage in politics are punished by being governed by those who are dumber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 151 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson