Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SirJohnBarleycorn
I would like to see more details, but my preliminary reaction is that taxpayers are likely to be better off with the Treasury plan.

Yes, I think that the original Paulson plan is better also.

One problem is that the politicians are just not financial professionals --- they are lawyers, and they are going to most likely choose a poor plan based on their instincts as lawyers.

At least with Secretary Paulson we have some chance of getting a more financially feasible plan than with a bunch of lawyers concocting "insurance" plans.

38 posted on 09/25/2008 6:55:12 PM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: snowsislander

“Yes, I think that the original Paulson plan is better also. “
>>>>>>>>>>....................
I would like to know what” Unions rep on bank boards” has to do with Original Paulson plan..lets get this strait the
pols have added so much to this plan that it is not going anyware..you nor I know all the crap they have added so how can you defend it??


41 posted on 09/25/2008 7:22:42 PM PDT by shadowgovernment (From the Ashes of a Republican rout will raise a Conservative Party)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson