Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama seeks to take down NRA ad
Politico ^ | Sept 25 | Ben Smith

Posted on 09/25/2008 1:58:33 PM PDT by bahblahbah

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last
To: bahblahbah
One of the 527s need to make an ad about 0bama's treatment of his opponent' ads. Mention how their campaign are fast to ban ads, movie, or anything they don't like.

The producers of Christmas Carrols need to be prepared for any possible ban by 0bama and his friends.

61 posted on 09/25/2008 2:26:42 PM PDT by paudio (Nobody cried 'racism' when Swann, Blackwell, and Steele lost to white guys in 2006)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MrB
Just goes to show you, to anger a conservative, lie about him, to anger a liberal, tell the truth about him.

Great post!
62 posted on 09/25/2008 2:26:49 PM PDT by Liberty Valance (Keep a simple manner for a happy life ;o)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
0bama, the CENSORSHIP candidate.

0bama, attacking free speech daily.

If you can't take the heat 0-bambi, then get out of the kitchen. How anyone thinks this guy can take on our enemies when he is too weak to handle a political ad.

63 posted on 09/25/2008 2:26:57 PM PDT by A message (Governor Palin is a great choice for Vice-President. McCain/ Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
Anyone who possessed one of these firearms in Illinois 90 days after the effective date would have had to “destroy the weapon or device, render it permanently inoperable, relinquish it to a law enforcement agency, or remove it from the state.” SB 1195, p. 5, line 33. Anyone who still possessed a banned gun would have been subject to a felony sentence. SB 1195, p. 5, line 15. This “seizure and surrender” provision was much more severe than the former federal “assault weapons” ban, which had a “grandfather clause” to allow current lawful owners to keep their guns. See 18 U.S.C. 922(v)(2) (repealed).

This bill is unconstitutional on 4th amendment grounds. If Obama is such a constitutional law scholar as he claims, how on earth could he support such a blatantly unconstitutional law? (stupid question from a bitter, gun-clinger.)

64 posted on 09/25/2008 2:29:03 PM PDT by MediaMole (If Plan A is to take multiple .338 shots to the back, you really need to come up with a Plan B.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Here in NC we are getting inundated with an ad featuring __ Shockey, a football player, pres. of some hunting assoc.

He claims both McCain and O’Bama will protect our right to own guns and defend ourselves. But O’Bama will straighten out the Country.
Oh, and McCain is a crook and deceptive.


65 posted on 09/25/2008 2:29:40 PM PDT by Vinnie (You're Nobody 'Til Somebody Jihads You)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

Comments there were interesting. A couple of calls to flag it so it gets taken down.


66 posted on 09/25/2008 2:30:38 PM PDT by GoLightly
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

bttt


67 posted on 09/25/2008 2:31:25 PM PDT by GOPJ (Let free markets work - stupid companies SHOULD go belly-up - including Frannie and Freddie.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

Isn’t the Obama still running the ad about individuals on McCain’s staff being lobbyists. He uses the word IS. This guy IS a lobbyist for oil, and this guy IS a lobbyist for banks. The use of the present tense IS, is not accurate and misleading.


68 posted on 09/25/2008 2:31:42 PM PDT by 11x62
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GoMonster

Is ANYONE against stem cell research? I think not.

There are people against using human embryos esp now when it’s been shown by researchers that you can obtain stem cells without using human embryos..


69 posted on 09/25/2008 2:32:05 PM PDT by nikos1121 (Obama-Biden Where's the beef?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 11x62

“. The use of the present tense IS, is not accurate and misleading.”

You don’t say?
Isn’t that special?

NY Times will get right on it I’m sure.

When I turn on GMA tomorrow I’m sure the discussion will be “what happened to Barak Obama?”


70 posted on 09/25/2008 2:34:29 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Clear violation of the First Amendment by the Obama campaign. The man’s a sitting Senator and I believe he says he taught constitutional law at the U of Chicago. Hopefully this wakes up a few sheeple as to how this thug would conduct himself in the Oval Office.


71 posted on 09/25/2008 2:35:54 PM PDT by Rummyfan (Iraq: it's not about Iraq anymore, it's about the USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nikos1121

plus - McCain is not opposed to research using embryonic lines that have already been created.
He is opposed to creating new embryos for the purpose of destroying them.

So that claim is misleading too.


72 posted on 09/25/2008 2:36:19 PM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

That’s racist. Your’re just saying that because he the only one in the picture that isn’t white. /sarc

(He looks like a complete dork.)


73 posted on 09/25/2008 2:37:16 PM PDT by KansasGirl (READ MY LIPSTICK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

That’s racist. You’re just saying that because he the only one in the picture that isn’t white. /sarc

(He looks like a complete dork.)


74 posted on 09/25/2008 2:37:26 PM PDT by KansasGirl (READ MY LIPSTICK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: blondee123

That’s racist. You’re just saying that because he the only one in the picture that isn’t white. /sarc

(He looks like a complete dork.)


75 posted on 09/25/2008 2:37:29 PM PDT by KansasGirl (READ MY LIPSTICK!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah

Maybe the NRA can provide a list of any media outlets that refuse the ads so we can maybe,boycott them or some of their advertisers.


76 posted on 09/25/2008 2:38:28 PM PDT by curth (No More Smears - We're Fighting Back McCain/Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dems_R_Losers

“One of them talks about a Corning plant that closed, and Corning has asked them to take it down because it is false”.

It’s still running, I must have seen it at least three times today alone.


77 posted on 09/25/2008 2:40:36 PM PDT by curth (No More Smears - We're Fighting Back McCain/Palin '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: bahblahbah
Democrats sure seem to like threatening broadcaster's licenses whenever they run ads that the Democrats don't like.

Is there any doubt that re-enactment of the so-called "Fairness Doctrine" will be the first order of business if Obama wins the election?

78 posted on 09/25/2008 2:40:58 PM PDT by kennedy (No relation to Teddy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KansasGirl
Photobucket
79 posted on 09/25/2008 2:41:25 PM PDT by proudtobeanamerican1 (God Bless Sarah Palin and her Family.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: Maine Mariner

While a state senator, Obama voted for legislation that would ban and forcibly confiscate nearly every shotgun, target rifle and hunting rifle in the state. Obama also voted for bills that would ration the number of firearms a law-abiding citizen could own, yet give a pass to the violent thugs who roam our streets. And, inexplicably, Obama voted four times against legislation that would allow citizens to use firearms to defend their homes and families.

http://www.prnewswire.com/cgi-bin/stories.pl?ACCT=ind_focus.story&STORY=/www/story/09-24-2008/0004891533&EDATE=WED+Sep+24+2008,+09:24+AM


80 posted on 09/25/2008 2:42:33 PM PDT by Beckwith ('Typical White Person')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-125 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson