Posted on 09/24/2008 5:55:46 PM PDT by SandRat
| WASHINGTON, Sept. 24, 2008 The Defense Department is examining its operations and strategy in Afghanistan as part of a broader U.S. governmental review, a senior Pentagon spokesman told reporters today.
Various departments within this government have been tasked to take a look at our Afghan strategy and are in the midst of doing that, Morrell said. The Defense Departments policy shop and the Office of the Joint Chiefs of Staff are working on ideas to present to Defense Secretary Robert M. Gates, Morrell said. The secretary, he said, will be briefed regularly on the reports progress. The Pentagon likely will examine things like Afghanistan force levels, civilian support, tactics and strategy, Morrell said. The Defense Departments work on the report began just within the past few days, Morrell said. There is still much work to be done, he said. Army Gen. David H. Petraeus, the former commander of Multinational Forces Iraq, is conducting a separate review of operations in Afghanistan, Morrell said. Petraeus takes responsibility for U.S. military operations in Afghanistan and Iraq when he becomes U.S. Central Commands chief in late October. The review is being conducted on a priority basis, Morrell said. We are running out of time in this administration, and so I expect, probably youll see products sooner than later, he said. In other Afghanistan-related issues, Morrell refuted unofficial reports out of Pakistan that claim U.S. helicopters had been fired on by Pakistani forces and that a U.S. military drone aircraft was downed in Pakistan. As far as we know, no American helicopters have been fired on by Pakistani forces, he said. And, as far as we know, none of our unmanned aerial vehicles has been downed by Pakistani forces. However, an American Predator UAV was reported through U.S. military channels as having crashed in Afghanistan in the last week or so, Morrell said. The aircraft crashed because of mechanical problems and certainly wasnt shot down, he said. |
Afghanistan has a thousand mile, mountainous border with Pakistan. While it might make sense to focus on the “tribal region” border, because those are the folks who consider themselves quasi-independent of Pakistan, in the long run the terrorists infiltrating Afghanistan would simply shift to some other part of the border.
Given that Pakistan doesn’t want the US to fight Al-Qaeda on the Pakistan side of the border, and recognizing that Pakistan is a “friend” of the US with nuclear weapons at stake if the country is overthrown from within, the US appears to be militarily restricted to the Afghan side of the border.
The US has been effective in controlling the Iranian and Syrian borders with Iraq. The terrain is not nearly as rugged, but they have learned some things about identifying insurgents versus civilians crossing the border. They’ve learned some things about controlling critical geographic junctures.
Since secrecy is a huge consideration for those insurgents attempting to cross from Pak to Afghan, that puts some limitations on the size and armament of any insurgent force.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.