You said: "get back to me" It's not my obligation to justify to you what I do with what is mine. It's up to you to cite the authority that allows you to claim what isn't yours. You're bitching about a bailout. Why? Because fat cat Wall Street types might benefit? You said: "And why not [provide for the government limiting executive compensation in a bailout bill?]" That isn't what's wrong with a bailout. What is wrong with a bailout is the interference in the market. And that's what is wrong with your view, i.e., you want to interfere.
You said: "Wall Street types should be thankful that they are not being carted away to prison pending trial for the crimes that’ve committed". I asked: "What crimes? Who committed the crimes? Who deserves to be carted off? Why aren't they being carted off? To whom should Wall Street types and fat cats be thankful?". No reply.
You said: "If the taxpayers are propping up a business, we’re investors and it becomes our business." How so? Who says? How does that work?
You said: "LOL - unbelievable!" You're all buzzed. High on emotion.
I've got to caramelize a few onions. Have a nice night, chum...
