Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCain and the POW Cover-up (Mega Barf Alert)
The Nation ^ | September 17, 2008 | Sydney H. Schanberg

Posted on 09/24/2008 4:49:06 AM PDT by DJ Taylor

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last
To: mnehrling
Anyone who believes this crock of crap is mentally deficient. Do you think Jesse Helms would have abandoned surviving POWs? Would Bob Smith? They signed off on everything that McCain signed off on.

McCain was not Chairman of the committee. He was not co-Chairman. He was a committee member along with every Vietnam vet in the Senate, save for Al Gore. It was not the first investigation into the POWS or even the second. It was the third and it happened 20 years after the war.

There was NO credible evidence that there were surviving POWs anywhere in SEA. There were rumors and outright lies from people who stood to gain from the frenzy. The committee chased thousands of these leads and found nothing. The report of the Select Committee is available online. It is a very balanced and fair assessment of the POW issue and worth a read.

21 posted on 09/24/2008 7:09:11 AM PDT by MARTIAL MONK (I'm waiting for the POP! It's gonna be a BIG one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: ravingnutter

Ted Sampley.
Well, if this had any legs, soon we’d see a group of POW’s coming out against McCain....
Ping me when that happens.
As far as the hearings, John McCain, IMHO, was adamant that this country wouldn’t leave them behind. It wouldn’t fit in with his ideology of honor and duty.


22 posted on 09/24/2008 7:40:59 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

“Guys, keep in mind that FR was asking these same questions too. I remember the McCain threads on 2000 asking questions about his POW status and criticizing his military service. So don’t act all trifled over this.”

And this was a much more frequently heard topic from the early to mid-’90s. There is just nothing new here, and those items mentioned in “The Nation” were being mentioned during the early ‘90s.

But I do wonder how many of the dismissive posters actually watched the hearings in 1992-1993.


23 posted on 09/24/2008 8:35:21 AM PDT by Will88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-23 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson