Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Congress still protecting you – from lightbulbs!
WorldNetDaily.com ^ | September 23, 2008 | Chelsea Schilling

Posted on 09/24/2008 2:17:18 AM PDT by Man50D

An act sponsored by 25 representatives asking the government to reconsider its ban on incandescent light bulbs has been stalled in committee – and the leading sponsor is faulting Democratic leadership.

The Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act highlights growing concerns over the safety and environmental impact of compact fluorescent bulbs, or CFLs. Before the sale of incandescent bulbs is banned, the representatives are asking the comptroller general to prove replacement with CFLs will be cost-effective, reduce overall carbon dioxide emissions by 20 percent in the United States by 2025 and that the bulbs will not pose a health risk to the general public.

However, the act has been delayed in the Subcommittee on Energy and Air Quality since March 14 – more than six months. U.S. Rep. Michele Bachmann, R-Minn., leading sponsor of the legislation, told WND Democrats are not concerned about pushing the act through.

"The Light Bulb Freedom of Choice Act, H.R. 5616, is currently collecting dust in the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, held up by Democrat leadership that refuses to make this legislation a priority," Bachmann said. "The Democrat leadership fills the congressional schedule with naming post offices and ends the work week early rather than do the people's business."

She continued, "They don't want to take up the real issues that make a difference in people's lives because those issues require them to make tough choices."

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: congress; energy; environment; govwatch
The socialist Democrats are looking for any means possible to control our lives through excessive legislation.
1 posted on 09/24/2008 2:17:19 AM PDT by Man50D
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I have talked with Michelle Bachmann in person and have heard her on talk shows about this.

Whoever supports mandating us to go to CFL’s has their head up their butt. It must be stopped !!


2 posted on 09/24/2008 2:26:20 AM PDT by LiveFreeOrDie2001 (Palin Power !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
As foolish as this may sound, this is a real issue for me. We have, in our home, several light fixtures that these CFL things will not fit into. They are just to big and they look terrible in the small flower shaped shades on the ceiling fans!

I hate Democrats—and their damned light bulbs!

3 posted on 09/24/2008 2:27:46 AM PDT by singfreedom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

DUH!! Our previous regulations regarding compact flourescent lights may possibly have been premature.

We will empanel a “Blue Ribbon Commission” to study the possibility of Prematurity, and whether the empanelling of this commission may have also been premature.

And, if found NOT to be premature on both counts, a new Commission will be empanelled to then study the efficacy, of said CFL’s.

The safety of such CFL’s will be studied by another panel at a later date ( now set for April 1st, 2718)

WOW ... 2 more paragraphs that say nothing like this, ... I could be a ... CONGRESSMAN ... 4 more ..a SENATOR


4 posted on 09/24/2008 2:27:50 AM PDT by gwilhelm56 (Orwell's 1984 - to Conservatives a WARNING, to Liberals - a TEXTBOOK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56

Please disregard the previous post. If I was to RUN, it would be with a large pitchfork, and my congressidiot just in front of me, and for HIS sake, running just a little FASTER!!!


5 posted on 09/24/2008 2:30:30 AM PDT by gwilhelm56 (Orwell's 1984 - to Conservatives a WARNING, to Liberals - a TEXTBOOK)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: gwilhelm56
We will empanel a “Blue Ribbon Commission”...
"This will require a 'fact-finding' junket to the Caribbean during which we will stay at a luxury hotel, play golf, and drink."

Pe(cynical)et
6 posted on 09/24/2008 4:08:46 AM PDT by Peet (If "con" is the opposite of "pro", what is the opposite of "progress"?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

Shouldn’t we be throwing 1200 billion at this fairy tale? After all it’s only money.


7 posted on 09/24/2008 4:09:01 AM PDT by Waco ( G00d bye 0'bomber)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
I cannot stand EVIL Dims any longer! Now they are so concerned with our light bulbs - next I fully expect it will be government-issued toilet paper.

I would have thought, though, that since they are sooooo concerned about safety and the environment, they would have demanded a decent lightbulb that doesn't create a hazmat disaster when you break one. The disposal aspect is another concern.

8 posted on 09/24/2008 4:18:39 AM PDT by Heartland Mom (I'm a Republican because EVERYONE can't be on welfare.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

You have probably seen this....but here is Ted Poe on the light bulbs:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=e-LOtKIIKcg


9 posted on 09/24/2008 4:35:21 AM PDT by Dudoight
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D; IrishCatholic; Normandy; Delacon; According2RecentPollsAirIsGood; TenthAmendmentChampion; ..
 




Beam me to Planet Gore !

10 posted on 09/24/2008 4:48:51 AM PDT by steelyourfaith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

You mean they’re done with the steroids in Major League Baseball issue? Glad these buffoons are tackling the tough issues that affect us.


11 posted on 09/24/2008 6:04:38 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Conceal carry - Don't leave home without it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D
Simply go to the government's own Department of Environmental Protection website and read what government experts recommend you do if you break one of the CFL bulbs. LINK and then decide whether or not they are hazardous to have in your home.

Note the tree huggers counter with the malarkey that by reducing electricity use we reduce coal burning power plants which emit mercury in minute quantities. I would argue that having all of the light bulbs in your home replaced with CFLs would put more mercury in your home than if you lived in a plume of emmissions from a power plant. Note moving to nuclear power and keeping incandescent bulbs eliminates the mercury problem.

12 posted on 09/24/2008 6:47:51 AM PDT by The Great RJ ("Mir we bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Man50D

I bought up many boxes of regular light bulbs in 60 and 100 watt from Costco some months back. Guess what, you can’t buy regular light bulbs at Costco anymore!

Hopefully I will have enough until they see the error of their ways on this issue. I use the CFL’s on my Porch lights that are on all night and that is it. The CFL’s will not fit many fixtures that we have in our homes.


13 posted on 09/24/2008 7:37:49 AM PDT by acoulterfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson