Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House OKs bill with clause to ban Georges Bank drilling
Fosters Daily Democrat (NH) ^ | 9/23/2008 | Jason Claffey

Posted on 09/23/2008 4:57:39 AM PDT by markomalley

PORTSMOUTH — In a move that could bode well for the continued conservation of Georges Bank, the U.S. House of Representatives last week approved an energy plan containing a provision prohibiting exploratory oil drilling in that area.

But with the federal offshore drilling ban set to expire Sept. 30 and the energy plan far from gaining final approval, the future Georges Bank is very much in limbo.

The entire New England House delegation voted for the plan, called the Comprehensive American Energy Security and Consumer Protection Act. It calls for, among other things, the expansion of offshore drilling 50-100 miles off the Atlantic and Pacific coasts; the creation of "hundreds of thousands" of new "green" jobs for the development of alternative energy; and the release of about 10 percent of the Strategic Petroleum Reserve.

It also prohibits oil and natural gas exploration of any national marine sanctuaries and monuments, as well as Georges Bank.

According to the text of the bill, Georges Bank is "one of the largest and historically important fishing grounds of the United States."

During negotiations last week Rep. William Delahunt, D-Mass., was credited with introducing a last-minute provision calling for the bank to be protected from expanding drilling. The soon-to-expire federal moratorium prevents drilling 3 to 200 miles off both coasts.

Resembling an egg-shaped underwater plateau, Georges Bank has been targeted for oil exploration because of its shallow depth, making drilling less expensive than in deeper areas like the California coast. But the unique shape of the bank creates a circular current that keeps nourishing food sources like plankton readily available to a variety of fish — making it equally important to commercial fishing companies and conservation groups who oppose lifting the federal ban.

Peter Shelley, vice president of the Conservation Law Foundation, called the House bill "irrelevant" to the short-term status of Georges Bank. "The question becomes if Congress passes a resolution that will have continued protection of Georges Bank," said Shelley, whose group pursued legal action that led to the passing of the federal drilling moratorium in 1982.

Shelley conceded the bank's depth — which even 160 miles offshore is still only 150 feet deep — would make it cheaper to drill there, though he pointed out there are no pipelines in the upper Atlantic to transport any oil that could be tapped out. The price of shipping the oil to refineries could offset the benefit of not needing to drill as deep, he said.

Pro-drilling lawmakers have said drilling will provide temporary relief while long-term solutions are explored; Shelley contended that thinking is counterintuitive because fossil fuels contribute to global warming and the benefits of additional oil will not be felt for at least a decade.

Shelley called oil "part of the problem we're in that we have to get out of."

He identified two aspects of oil development that could affect Georges Bank's marine life, which includes cod, haddock, herring, sea scallops, humpback whales, fin whales and dolphins. First, waste discharges from drilling operations would be a continuous problem, he said, and a large-scale oil spill would be particularly damaging because of the bank's whirlpool-like currents.

"A spill on Georges Bank would stay there for quite some time," he said.

U.S. Sen. Judd Gregg, R-N.H., agreed Georges Bank has a "sensitive environmental status."

Gregg said any coastal state — including New Hampshire — should have the final say in deciding on drilling proposals.

An alternative energy plan supported by about 20 senators calls for expanding offshore drilling in the eastern part of the Gulf of Mexico and allow North Carolina, South Carolina, Virginia and Georgia to decide on their own to allow drilling.

"Any decision on whether to pursue offshore drilling in this area should involve the coastal states," he said.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Government
KEYWORDS: congress; drilling; energy; environment; lackofenergybill
Drill baby drill

But not in my backyard

1 posted on 09/23/2008 4:57:39 AM PDT by markomalley
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: markomalley
As a person who fishes in the gulf of Mexico as a sportsman

The platforms are great fishing spots.

Stuck on Stupid these fools.

2 posted on 09/23/2008 5:00:55 AM PDT by scooby321 (Cai)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
Stuck on Stupid these fools.

More like "Stuck on Suicide" if you ask me.

3 posted on 09/23/2008 5:03:13 AM PDT by raybbr (You think it's bad now - wait till the anchor babies start to vote!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

LET THE BAN DIE!

DRILL BABY DRILL

Why didn’t pelosi just say drilling is only allowed two galaxies over to the left and only on tuesdays... it would have been more honest.


4 posted on 09/23/2008 5:06:31 AM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: raybbr; scooby321

Stuck on Murder then Suicide.


5 posted on 09/23/2008 5:07:06 AM PDT by FreeAtlanta (NOBAMA - it is for our future)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: scooby321
As a 32 year fishing writer/broadcaster in S.Fla. you don't have to be a rocket scientist to figure out that if we drill off the Southwestern coast of Fla. especially near Cape Sable we will have oil and quickly.
Off the cape the drop-off is one foot per mile for the first 70-80 miles.
Forty miles out you are n 40 feet of water. In those depths crude comes up fast and the entire process is speeded up.
Now if some Fla. rinos will just come on board.
6 posted on 09/23/2008 5:08:55 AM PDT by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

I thought Georges Bank was fished out?


7 posted on 09/23/2008 5:12:20 AM PDT by RexBeach ("Americans never quit!" Douglas MacArthur)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

Of course the New England voters who will be paying record high heating oil costs will blame Bush and not the idiot envirowhackos democrats who at every turn try to block more oil to come to market.


8 posted on 09/23/2008 5:17:51 AM PDT by DallasBiff
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RexBeach
Not hardly, it's still a big area for swordfish and many other species. But for any area to be out of bounds puts fish/enviro wackos first and consumers, Americas last,dumb move.
9 posted on 09/23/2008 5:22:39 AM PDT by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: markomalley

By all means, let’s not introduce any new industry or employment opportunities that might be beneficial to the population of the coastal Northeast.

It’s not like we have an oil shortage or large numbers of unemployed fishermen .....


10 posted on 09/23/2008 6:13:30 AM PDT by Senator John Blutarski (The progress of government: republic, democracy, technocracy, bureaucracy, plutocracy, kleptocracy,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rodguy911

For thousands of years when there was an oil slick over the whole costal ocean covering Southern California into Mexico and the beaches covered with tar until the current oil platforms were installed and relieved the natural flow it didn’t hurt marine life one bit.


11 posted on 09/23/2008 6:51:43 AM PDT by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dalereed
No surprise there, no one knows it but natural pollution is far more of a problem in the world than anything we could ever do or have ever done. We are indeed within the clutches of the marxist Dems and are not fighting back near hard enough.
12 posted on 09/23/2008 9:37:43 AM PDT by rodguy911 (HOME OF THE FREE BECAUSE OF THE BRAVE--GO SARAHCUDA !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson