To: DallasBiff
Well, what you said is simply not true. In 2006, the top three polls for senate races were SurveyUSA (off by 1.5%), and only missed ONE race out of 49 called; Mason-Dixon had 14 called, (off by 1.4%), and had one wrong; and Rasmussen called eight and got all eight, with a margin of error of 1.4%.
SurveyUSA is extremely reliable, and this is not good news.
22 posted on
09/22/2008 9:49:12 AM PDT by
LS
("Castles made of sand, fall in the sea . . . eventually." (Hendrix))
To: LS
The Rep base sat out the election in 2006.
Better years to compare are 2000,2002 and 2004.
To: LS
LS, SUSA is okay at best.
This is the same outfit that had McCain up by 20% in NC recently.
Battleground the only pollster that has no bias, unlike SUSA and Gallup, has McCain up +1 today.
To: LS
And if I remeber correctly, you LS when I was lurking on FR, you yourself were predicting that the GOP was going to hold Congress in 2006. So why should i trust your opinion?
Also aren't you a college professor, and may have a vested interest in keeping alive the polling industry.
To: LS
#the internals are even bigger crap.#
55% of respondents were college graduates LOL!
That can’t be realistic!
44 posted on
09/22/2008 10:12:01 AM PDT by
mrsmith
To: LS
i highly doubt it !!
VA is a republican state. Dynamics being as they are now I see mccain winning VA by 5 points.
don’t get me wrong - he still has to campaign there.
53 posted on
09/22/2008 10:24:39 AM PDT by
zwerni
(*** PALIN/mccain 2008 ***)
To: LS
Isn’t SurveyUSA usually right at election day, but well off the mark over a month earlier.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson