Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NBC jokes: Todd Palin has sex with daughters
World Net Daily ^ | September 21, 2008 | Joe Kovacs

Posted on 09/22/2008 5:46:17 AM PDT by Tulsa Ramjet

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last
To: ClancyJ

Maybe this will help you. Rush says he uses absurdity to demonstrate absurdity. That’s what was going on in this skit.


101 posted on 09/22/2008 7:47:37 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ

“What a praise. Now, even filled with trash and insults to OUR CANDIDATES AND THEIR UNDERAGE FAMILIES, it is the best satire pieces you have ever seen.”

Did you watch it?
They didn’t insult the Palin’s.
They insulted the msm for making up ridiculous bizarre rumours.

“Are they to laugh at talk of incest with their children? Is a husband’s reputation merely to be fodder for a best satire for the public consumption?”

of course not!
I’m sure they were not laughing when the Daily Kos started the incest garbage, and the NY Times weirdos asked for DNA tests.

That’s why this skit was funny.


102 posted on 09/22/2008 7:48:35 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

Do you realize how silly your thinking is becoming? No offense meant - but think over what you are doing.

They get on the air one of the most evil insults to a candidate’s family and we totally ignore this and praise them because it was funny and it skewed the media.

They must be laughing at this thread, giving high fives and telling each other “I told you it would work - just put the lies/slander in a skit chastising the media and they will accept it. And, we get a free ride on saying Todd molests his daughters”.

Give me a break!

Do we love trash so much that we will allow anything as long as it satisfies our desire for something from the gutter?

Is this what the seasons of TV fare have brought the public to?


103 posted on 09/22/2008 7:48:38 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

I did not go to the site - but if true - that was out of line also at the expense of our candidate and her family.


104 posted on 09/22/2008 7:50:05 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

I hope the SNL writers aren’t reading this thread. They would have a field day with the pomposity and bone hotheadedness on display by people so intent on being offended they can’t see straight.


105 posted on 09/22/2008 7:52:23 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: ClancyJ

“I did not go to the site - but if true - that was out of line also at the expense of our candidate and her family.”

it’s very difficult to discuss this when many people refuse to watch it.

Are you aware the incest rumours were already “out there?”
promoted by the whackos at Daily Kos and democratic underground?

SNL was making fun of the loony left.


106 posted on 09/22/2008 7:53:15 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 104 | View Replies]

To: DManA

“I hope the SNL writers aren’t reading this thread. They would have a field day with the pomposity and bone hotheadedness on display by people so intent on being offended they can’t see straight.”

I think we’re providing them with next week’s material.


107 posted on 09/22/2008 7:54:13 AM PDT by Scotswife
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Surely you forgot the /sarc tag.

Maybe you think we are cowardly enough that we will not risk the ire of the left. Maybe you think our candidates have to allow destruction of their reputations and the lives of their children because the liberals are mean.

Maybe you do not know or understand a Sarah or other GOP members.

We do not tolerate such.

Which is exactly why the left is in meltdown.

But you just play along and allow your freedoms to be destroyed.


108 posted on 09/22/2008 7:54:41 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

I realize that they were lampooning the liberal bias of the New York Times.

But the skit wasn’t funny. Funny being defined as making me or anyone in the audience laugh.

The timing was off, he mispronounced his punch lines, it was amateur hour.


109 posted on 09/22/2008 7:59:27 AM PDT by WilliamReading
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

While SNL should not have gone down the road of incest, the skit itself was a slap at the drive-by media.


110 posted on 09/22/2008 7:59:40 AM PDT by oldvike
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: stockstrader

Imagine a a sketch of a bunch of white reporters going to Kenya to report on Obama’s family and how they live. Even if they were supposed to be “ignorant racists” asking about polygamy, living in huts with dirt floors and such, the skit itself would be condemned as racist.


111 posted on 09/22/2008 7:59:47 AM PDT by roses of sharon (The MSM vampires must die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

You are right - God forbid.

Why would I even want to read it if it is worse than this skit.

I do not enjoy the trash put out by Hollywood thinking they are creative when in fact, they can no longer create due to the depravity they dwell in and their drug soaked brains.

I do not enjoy depravity. I believe that the Lord expects more of us here on earth than catering to the devil as he promotes his evil in the world destroying all that is good.

And call me naive, call me a prude - I don’t care.

And I tend to defend Sarah and her family as she and McCain try and save our liberties for us.

But enjoy your intellectual freedoms.


112 posted on 09/22/2008 8:01:06 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

I can guarantee that if I had seen something trashy about our candidates - I would have commented.

Can’t tolerate our own side playing nice with the dems and allowing our candidates being treated with such disrespect. And like others have said - incest is never funny.


113 posted on 09/22/2008 8:03:37 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: syriacus

You got that right. Shows the effect TV has had on the tolerance of depravity in the last few years. We can not tolerate this stuff as funny while others laugh along and see nothing wrong with an innocent man being accused on national TV of incest with his daughters - merely because his wife is running to help our side win.

And they fume because we do not see that it is ok as long as it attacks the media. Funny, this must be how propaganda works.


114 posted on 09/22/2008 8:08:05 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet; All

this was actually criticizing the media. You left off the next part......


115 posted on 09/22/2008 8:12:19 AM PDT by rwfromkansas ("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

You don’t attack underage children of politicians in a political campaign. That is over the line and beyond the pale.

The writers of the Saturday night Live “Palin Family Incest” skit could easily have used infidelity rumors aimed at Gov. Palin and her husband Todd as a back drop for the NY Times slam.

Instead they went out of their way to drag in under age female innocents with the writing help of a Democratic candidate for Minnesota’s Federal Senate seat, AL Frankin.

To bring up and “culturally legitimize” a discussion of incest between Todd Palin and his daughters Bristol, Willow, and Piper on SNL is to subject them to endless questions from their peers and reporters for the rest of their lives about their relationship with their father.

In Bristol’s case the parentage of her child will be called into question, again.

To those who think this won’t happen, please see jokes about Justice Clarence Thomas and Coke cans, Har, Har Har...

To subject innocents to that kind of long term, unnecessary, verbal assault “for a laugh” is Evil. To do so for political gain and power...is more than just Evil.

That the SNL writers chose to do so demonstrates that they have a hole where their souls should be. An aching hole that they have to fill with other people’s pain, just to feel alive.


116 posted on 09/22/2008 8:18:35 AM PDT by Dark Wing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DManA

I saw the skit and the major parts were enjoyable.

I still think it was a cheap shot to use Todd, incest and his daughters to make their point.

And, my comments stand - we should not allow that kind of depravity to be used on our candidate’s families.


117 posted on 09/22/2008 8:22:32 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Tulsa Ramjet

Every Saturday @ 11:30 p.m. I await with unbridled anticipation just a glimpse of Goddess Tina Fey, surrounded by her gut-busting comedy troupe, in order for my week to completed. Unless this happens, I am not a complete man. In order to make it thru the week until my next chance at SNL, I will watch “The Daily Show” or some other “hot” show the liberal elite tell me to watch. -sarc


118 posted on 09/22/2008 8:26:29 AM PDT by frogjerk (MSM: We will not question Obama bin Biden...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Scotswife

I’m sorry you do not understand what I am defending. I don’t care if the Daily Kos put out those rumors - that does not condone the insult to Sarah and her family.

She needs to be defended against such stuff. Afterall, she is the one saving the GOP and giving us a chance in this election. Why would you feel her family must be used like this? There is no need for the incest stuff - they could have used some silly comment she made or something.

We complain about sexism, racism - yet we are to tolerate the abuse of a candidate’s family? No - not me. They could have had the same skit without throwing that out there on nation wide tv. It furthers the lies while indicating there is no proof either way.

Be careful what you allow the liberals to do to you. They are incidious and evil. Just because they promote evil and break all rules, does not mean they have the right to abuse us.


119 posted on 09/22/2008 8:28:03 AM PDT by ClancyJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: IYAS9YAS

Neither am I.They wanted to plant this visual in the mind of the viewers.They really just add more votes for Palin and they can’t see that.I think it’s a disgrace.


120 posted on 09/22/2008 8:35:59 AM PDT by fatima (Put your lipstick on girls and go vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson