My irony meter just exploded.
The RIAA case is prima facie vexatious.
If this attorney is defending people against RIAA lawsuits, he can’t be “vexatious” litigator.
Not all lawyers are scum. But a big percentage of them are.
The RIAA are scum. Its amazing to me that they can sometimes get thousands, tens of thousands, or hundreds of thousands of dollars from someone who downloaded hundreds of dollars worth of songs. Or whose ten year downloaded something.
So if they win a case, like they thought they did in Thomas, it’s perfectly OK to publicize that fact for their own ends, but if someone else publicizes details of a different trail (that are already public record anyway), that’s bad?