Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sunnyflorida
Sunny, the issue for the banks was not how to write down the assets, but how much, and Cox, nor anyone else could get a handle on a falling knife.

It mattered not if the reporting was accurate, as by the time the ink dried, things had all changed.

Cox, and the entire Fed could not advise anyone on what to do with the balance sheet, as there was no guideline or way to value it. The market could not determine it, and if they could not, then the value essentially was zero! But you can't put that on your balance sheet.

394 posted on 09/21/2008 9:55:22 AM PDT by Cold Heat (Well....................................That's .....that.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 367 | View Replies ]


To: Cold Heat

” the value essentially was zero! But you can’t put that on your balance sheet. “

You make my point. The SEC is in charge of SEC filings and the balance sheets in the 10-Ks and 10-Qs of these companies were overstated. The SEC should have called for a “review.” They do it all the time in my names. Crap they called BOBJ on the carpet for not stating license backlog. But it is impossible for a software company to have backlog. They SEC finally gave up but it took them several quarters before the idiot rookie SEC official in the SF office got lessoned.


494 posted on 09/21/2008 1:47:06 PM PDT by Sunnyflorida (Unless you are nice and thoughtful you will be ignored. Write in Thomas Sowell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson