Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Sunnyflorida

What is your concern with the MER-BAC deal? I thought M&A was one long-standing solution for “buggy-whip co’s”? I can see potential kicking-the-can-down-the-road of problems in the whole sector, by making commercial/investment amalgams now the perceived solution, but please elaborate.


361 posted on 09/21/2008 9:35:46 AM PDT by 9YearLurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 308 | View Replies ]


To: 9YearLurker

Here are two concerns over the MER BAC deal.

While the insured assets of BAC operating company will not increase the likely hood there will be a call goes up. FDIC if thinking correctly will have to raise rates on everybody to cover the additional risk. FDIC should moratorium these combinations until everything else get sorted out.

Second MER is a house of cards fundamentally. Even without the current liquidity and derivative issues. If BAC wanted to get into the lines of business you see at a BD like MER they would be better off buying them piecemeal. But I would not recommend that for BAC share holders.

The repeal of Glass-Steagall permits this mergerm, but it should not grant an automatic approval. I am BTW in favor of repealing the repeal of Glass-Steagall. I have quite a bit of personal experience in this and it is an ugly outcome.


382 posted on 09/21/2008 9:46:54 AM PDT by Sunnyflorida (Unless you are nice and thoughtful you will be ignored. Write in Thomas Sowell.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 361 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson