Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BusterBear

Maybe you know the timing of this. When the Republicans barely had the majority, or it was tied, wasn’t there some rule change that occurred that made it necessary to have a super majority to get anything passed? Who initiated that rule change? I’m thinking Hillary had something to do with that. And, did this rule change cause some good and needed reforms, to be tossed?


337 posted on 09/21/2008 9:23:26 AM PDT by stayathomemom ( nowanemptynester)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies ]


To: stayathomemom

I thought it was a ‘left-over’ from earlier dim congresses.


342 posted on 09/21/2008 9:26:02 AM PDT by mathluv (The Barracuda and the Maverick will take on the Messiah and the Mouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

To: stayathomemom
When the Republicans barely had the majority, or it was tied, wasn’t there some rule change that occurred that made it necessary to have a super majority to get anything passed? Who initiated that rule change?

I remember this, but I don't remember the details of the rule change. All I recall is that the Democrats just needed to threaten a filibuster, without having an actual filibuster, and that was enough to sink any legislation the Republican majority wanted.

Need to do some research on the details.

381 posted on 09/21/2008 9:46:49 AM PDT by BusterBear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 337 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson