But generally it's true. He's commented on air that his own family is against it, if my memory serves.
Just this week he commented on it as if to acknowledge it as something that not all appreciate. He seemed to me to be a bit circumspect. I have no way to prove it.
But most important is I commented above on his misrepresentation of what Rush says. Rush has not given Wall Street a pass.
Savage started this about five years ago. It adds nothing to conservatism. IMO. Misrepresentation of competitors' views just ain't right.
He could have used his competitors' support in his efforts to get CAIR.
The whole lot of today's most popular national talk show hosts could disappear over night and be replaced the next day by men and women just as patriotic, intelligent, and dedicated to America.
This should not be a battle among egos. It's about whose America wins the so-called culture war -- that is, IMO, a battle in the bigger world war to defend against radical Islam. We lose the battle we've lost the war.
Thus it is from that perspective that as long as I have the privilege to post on Free Republic I will criticize whomever I please. I will not always be right, of course. I've have said it many times, truth is more important than my ego.
(Yes, talk radio is above all a business.)
The truth as I see it is that a "Gorelick Wall" of egos cut off the excellent and brave Savage maneuver to expose CAIR.
Cooperation among talk shows would have destroyed CAIR in court. IMO. The copyright stuff was thrown out but the rest was the stuff of serious exposure of CAIR and could have proceeded.